Assessing and improving SCADA security in the dutch drinking water sector
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The exploitation of field device firmware is a least focused research area.
“Surprisingly, the exploitation of field device firmware is a least focused research area [59,60,61].”
From Architecture and security of SCADA systems: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [60]
Cites
Cleveland, F. M. (2006) · IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition · doi:10.1109/tdc.2006.1668652 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
SCADA Security Good Practices for the Drinking Water Sector
Luiijf, H. A. M. (2008) · TNO Repository · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey of cyber security management in industrial control systems
Knowles, W., Prince, D., Hutchison, D., Disso, J. F. P., & Jones, K. (2015) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2015.02.002 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Architecture and security of SCADA systems: A review
Yadav, G., & Paul, K. (2021) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100433 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
A time-driven and event-driven approach for substation feeder incident analysis
Chen, C.-R., Chang, C.-J., & Lee, C.-H. (2016) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.07.017 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Luiijf, E., Ali, M., & Zielstra, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 124-134
- ISSN
- 1874-5482 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980808287
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
- Keywords
- SCADA security, drinking water sector, process control systems, information security, security benchmarking, security posture, best practices, critical infrastructure protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
