Cited by 16Network Security and Intrusion DetectionSmart Grid Security and ResilienceAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Using Kolmogorov–Arnold network for cyber-physical system security: A fast and efficient approach

Ghorbani, Mohammadmahdi, Ghassemi, Alimohammad, Alikhani, Mohammad, Khaloozadeh, Hamid, Nikoofard, Amirhossein·2025·International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcip.2025.100768

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Correlation-based methods are particularly suitable for attacks and faults that selectively perturb a subset of variables while keeping other measurements within nominal ranges, and for scenarios where the key symptom is a collapse or distortion of inter-sensor correlation rather than a large deviation of a single signal.

    “This makes them particularly suitable for attacks and faults that selectively perturb a subset of variables while keeping other measurements within nominal ranges, as well as for scenarios where the key symptom is a collapse or distortion of inter-sensor correlation rather than a large deviation of a single signal [94,96,99-101,106-108].”
  • Some sensor-correlation-based models learn temporal correlations and cross-sensor dependencies implicitly using deep RNNs, LSTMs, attention mechanisms, or Transformers applied to multivariate sequences.

    “Some models learn temporal correlations and cross-sensor dependencies implicitly using deep RNNs, LSTMs, attention mechanisms, or Transformers applied to multivariate sequences [88,90,93,98,108,110], while others make correlations explicit through graph structures, digital twins, energy-based physics features, or multi-instance representations [94,96,99,101,104,106,107].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghorbani, M., Ghassemi, A., Alikhani, M., Khaloozadeh, H., & Nikoofard, A.
Affiliations
K. N. Toosi University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Nikoofard, Amirhossein
Venue
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-09
Volume
50
Pages
100768
ISSN
1874-5482 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411022487
Cited by
14
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (publishedVersion)
Funders
K.N.Toosi University of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
Kolmogorov-Arnold networks, cyber-physical systems, intrusion detection, cyberattack detection, lightweight neural networks, real-time deployment, industrial control systems, SWaT dataset, WADI dataset, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review