Cited by 184Disaster Management and ResilienceEarthquake and Disaster Impact StudiesDisaster Response and Management

Women in natural disasters: A case study from southern coastal region of Bangladesh

Alam, Khurshed, Rahman, Md. Habibur·2014·International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.01.003

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alam, K., & Rahman, M. H.
Corresponding author
Alam, Khurshed
Venue
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
8
Pages
68-82
ISSN
2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026188645
Cited by
184
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
FWCI
18.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Academy for Planning and Development (NAPD)
  • Ministry of Planning, Government of the People׳s Republic of Bangladesh
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
Keywords
disaster preparedness, coastal communities, disaster risk, livelihood loss, sexual harassment, inverse care law, disaster recovery, low-income populations, capital formation, gender and disaster

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review