Cited by 48Disaster Management and ResilienceRisk Perception and ManagementFlood Risk Assessment and Management

Factors influencing fire, earthquake, and cyclone risk perception in Yangon, Myanmar

Fernandez, Glenn, Tun, Aye Min, Okazaki, Kenji, Zaw, Saw Htwe, Kyaw, Kyaw·2018·International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernandez, G., Tun, A. M., Okazaki, K., Zaw, S. H., & Kyaw, K.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Yangon Technological University (MM)
Corresponding author
Fernandez, Glenn
Venue
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
28
Pages
140-149
ISSN
2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792977042
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies
  • Global Sustainability (ICA817)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Keywords
risk perception, fire risk, seismic risk, cyclone risk, natural hazards, disaster preparedness, sociodemographic factors, experiential factors, Yangon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review