University employees’ preparedness for natural hazards and incidents of mass violence: An application of the extended parallel process model
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-efficacy is positively associated with preparedness intentions and preparedness behaviors across disaster contexts, including university settings and earthquake-prone environments.
“Empirical evidence further indicates that self-efficacy is positively associated with preparedness intentions and preparedness behaviors across disaster contexts, including university settings and earthquake-prone environments [30][31][32].”
From A comparative study on Earthquake Preparedness of Japanese and International Students in a Nankai Trough Earthquake-threatened Area in Shikoku, Japan (2026) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Required sample size to detect the mediated effect
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x · Cited by 4,810 · see citing works
Kim, H.-Y. (2013) · Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics · doi:10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52 · Cited by 4,035 · see citing works
Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model
Witte, K. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376276 · Cited by 3,880 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weber, M. C., Pavlacic, J. M., Gawlik, E. A., Schulenberg, S. E., & Buchanan, E. M. (2020) · Traumatology · doi:10.1037/trm0000210 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationAtalyan, T., & Bhandary, N. P. (2026) · Natural Hazards Research · doi:10.1016/j.nhres.2026.07.004
- Authors
- Weber, M. C., Schulenberg, S. E., & Lair, E. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Mississippi (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weber, Marcela C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- 1082-1091
- ISSN
- 2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2795466998
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
- Keywords
- disaster preparedness, university employees, natural hazards, mass violence, Extended Parallel Process Model, threat perception, self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility, gender differences, disaster impact, faculty and staff
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
