Cited by 24Disaster Management and ResilienceSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change and Sustainable Development

Barriers to the implementation of international agreements on the ground: Climate change and resilience building in the Araucanía Region of Chile

Open access
Banwell, Nicola, Gesche, Alejandra Stehr, Vilches, Octavio Rojas, Hostettler, Silvia·2020·International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract

Implementing disaster risk reduction (DRR), climate change adaptation and mitigation (CCA/M), and sustainable development are key to increasing community resilience to pressing climate change risks. Barriers to grassroots implementation of national and international policies are inexorably linked to local contexts, and in-depth understanding of these barriers is crucial in areas greatly impacted by climate change. This research applied an empirical mixed-methods approach to identify the barriers to implementing grassroots climate resilience in the Araucanía Region in central-southern Chile. Data was collected in the form of expert interviews, 454 questionnaires of community members, community focus group discussions, and historical climate data for the region. The need to strengthen local-level implementation persists in the Araucanía Region. Barriers to implementation include limited horizontal and multi-sectoral governance, and inadequate allocation of human and financial resources at the local level. The majority of community members expressed that they had some (71% n = 322) or a lot (10% n = 47) of climate change knowledge, with 91% (n = 409) indicating that their community is impacted by climate change, and half correctly perceived changes in several climate-related hazards. However, a misconception held by experts regarding community knowledge represents a barrier that limits opportunities for leveraging community willingness to take action, and impedes the inclusion of community priorities into national policies. Opportunities exist to strengthen grassroots climate resilience by adopting a coherent approach which links DRR and CCA/M to key community concerns in sustainable development. National and regional actors need to work closely with municipal governments to mobilize synergies and foster meaningful grassroots action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101703

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Important enabling forces for NbS implementation in LAC communities stem from collaborations with grassroots and other nongovernmental climate mitigation initiatives.

    “These forces stem from collaborations with grassroots and other nongovernmental climate mitigation initiatives (93).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [93]

    Section 4.2.2 says community organizations and networks contribute to climate adaptation in Chile and that community willingness can strengthen grassroots resilience. The paper does not establish that collaborations with nongovernmental mitigation initiatives enable nature-based solutions (NbS) across Latin America and the Caribbean; its discussion centers on resilience in Chile’s Araucanía Region. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. UNFCCC, Opportunities and options for integrating climate change adaptation with the sustainable development goals and the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180894X00133, 2017. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banwell, N., Gesche, A. S., Vilches, O. R., & Hostettler, S.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Concepción (CL)
Corresponding author
Hostettler, Silvia
Venue
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
50
Pages
101703
ISSN
2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036563743
Cited by
24
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Swiss Bilateral Research Programs: Leading House for the Latin American Region (SMG1710)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
Keywords
implementation barriers, disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation, sustainable development, local governance, community participation, municipal government, Araucanía, international climate agreements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review