The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COVID-19 risk perception and coping mechanisms: Does gender make a difference?
Open accessAbstract
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) emerged as a real threat to humans, drastically disrupting everyday life in 2020-21. Although the pandemic affected people from all walks of life, irrespective of age or gender, the way the risk is perceived varies from one person to another. The pandemic risk reduction strategies can only be effective if individuals and communities respond positively to them, and for that, it is important to understand how the risk is perceived and responded to, differently by different groups of people. Gender plays a vital role in shaping risk perceptions and coping strategies, reflecting the predisposition of the public to accept health interventions and take precautionary measures. This study aims to understand the gender differences in COVID-19 risk perception and coping mechanisms - Pakistan is selected as a case study area. Following on from designing the questionnaire, which included 40 indicators grouped into domains (four risk perception and three coping mechanisms domains), an online survey was conducted, and a sample of 389 respondents was collected (248 male and 141 female). An index-based approach was used to quantify risk perception and its domains (fear, behaviour, awareness, and trust), and likewise coping mechanisms and their domains (problem, emotion, and action). Statistical tests were employed to ascertain the differences among both genders, whereas regression modelling was used to measure the effect of gender on overall risk perception and coping mechanisms. Results reveal that perceived fear and trust varied significantly between Pakistani men and women, while coping mechanisms were also notably different between the two genders. Females were found to perceive risks higher, complied more with the government's guidelines, and coped better than males in response to COVID-19. These findings imply that the gender aspect must be incorporated in designing effective communication and risk reduction strategies to efficiently address the current and potential future pandemic situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several previous studies have confirmed a significant relationship between risk perceptions and coping strategies”
From What influences tourist behaviors during and after the COVID-19 pandemic? Focusing on theories of risk, coping, and resilience (2022) · cites this paper as Rana et al., 2021
In the citing paper
“Even in the context of COVID-19, studies have confirmed the significant relationship between risk and people's choice of coping strategies”
From What influences tourist behaviors during and after the COVID-19 pandemic? Focusing on theories of risk, coping, and resilience (2022) · cites this paper as Rana et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,038
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,269
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation
Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C.-Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2022) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8 · Cited by 4,332 · cited 1×
“However, the findings did not collaborate with other research studies [49].”
ResultRisk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world
Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C. R., Kerr, J. R., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G. L., van der Bles, A. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193 · Cited by 1,815
Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed
Lurie, N., Saville, M., Hatchett, R., & Halton, J. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2005630 · Cited by 1,557
People at Risk of Flooding: Why Some Residents Take Precautionary Action While Others Do Not
Grothmann, T., & Reußwig, F. (2006) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6 · Cited by 1,365
Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review
Bish, A., & Michie, S. (2010) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910710x485826 · Cited by 1,246
The deadly coronaviruses: The 2003 SARS pandemic and the 2020 novel coronavirus epidemic in China
Yang, Y., Peng, F., Wang, R., Guan, K., Jiang, T., Xu, G., Sun, J., & Chang, C. C.-C. (2020) · Journal of Autoimmunity · doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102434 · Cited by 1,105
Sjöberg, L. (2000) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00001 · Cited by 1,082
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- O'Donnell, 2020, Playing the long game: how a gender lens can mitigate harm caused by pandemics, Cent. Glob. Dev.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Raghu Raman, R., Subramaniam, N., Nair, V. K., Shivdas, A., Achuthan, K., & Nedungadi, P. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14159160 · Cited by 244
Abdullah, M., Ali, N., Hussain, S. A., Aslam, A. B., & Javid, M. A. (2021) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.04.023 · Cited by 180
Self-citationHan, S., Yoon, A., Kim, M. J., & Yoon, J.-H. (2022) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.02.024 · Cited by 97
“Several previous studies have confirmed a significant relationship between risk perceptions and coping strategies (Gerhold, 2020; Lopez-Vazquez & Marvan, 2003; Rana et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021a).”
Health and safety risks faced by delivery riders during the Covid-19 pandemic
Tran, N. A. T., Nguyen, H. L. A., Nguyen, T. B. H., Nguyen, Q. H., Huynh, T. N. L., Pojani, D., Thị, B. N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2022) · Journal of Transport & Health · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2022.101343 · Cited by 77
Examining the persistence of telecommuting after the COVID-19 pandemic
Mohammadi, M., Rahimi, E., Davatgari, A., Javadinasr, M., Mohammadian, A., Conway, M., Salon, D., Derrible, S., Pendyala, R. M., & Khoeini, S. (2022) · Transportation Letters · doi:10.1080/19427867.2022.2077582 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Rana, I. A., Bhatti, S. S., Aslam, A. B., Jamshed, A., Ahmad, J., & Shah, A. A.
- Affiliations
- National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
- University of Ulster (GB)
- University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK)
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Rana, Irfan Ahmad
- Venue
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 102096
- ISSN
- 2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7987376
- OpenAlex
- W3127748913
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 30
- FWCI
- 53.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, risk perception, coping strategies, gender differences, fear, public trust in government, pandemic communication, risk mitigation strategies, Pakistan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
