The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies
Open accessAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has made a significant impact on various supply chains (SCs). All around the world, the COVID-19 pandemic affects different dimensions of SCs, including but not limited to finance, lead time, demand changes, and production performance. There is an urgent need to respond to this grand challenge. The catastrophic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic prompted scholars to develop innovative SC disruption management strategies and disseminate them via numerous scientific articles. However, there is still a lack of systematic literature survey studies that aim to identify promising SC disruption management strategies through the bibliometric, network, and thematic analyses. In order to address this drawback, this study presents a set of up-to-date bibliometric, network, and thematic analyses to identify the influential contributors, main research streams, and disruption management strategies related to the SC performance under the COVID-19 settings. The conducted analyses reveal that resilience and sustainability are the primary SC topics. Furthermore, the major research themes are found to be food, health-related SCs, and technology-aided tools (e.g., artificial intelligence (AI), internet of things (IoT), and blockchains). Various disruption management strategies focusing on resilience and sustainability themes are extracted from the most influential studies that were identified as a part of this work. In addition, we draw some managerial insights to ensure a resilient and sustainable supply of critical products in the event of a pandemic, such as personal protective equipment (PPE) and vaccines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
3 retracted
Blockchain in supply chain management: a review, bibliometric, and network analysis
Moosavi, J., Naeni, L. M., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., & Fiore, U. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13094-3 · Cited by 290
Self-citationRetractedButt, A. S. (2021) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-11-2020-0455 · Cited by 191
RetractedRETRACTED: Supply chains and COVID-19: impacts, countermeasures and post-COVID-19 era
Butt, A. S. (2021) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-02-2021-0114 · Cited by 36
RetractedChen, C. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20317 · Cited by 6,433
The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z · Cited by 3,115
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 · Cited by 2,131
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727 · Cited by 2,100
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450 · Cited by 1,790
Ivanov, D. (2022) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6 · Cited by 1,343
Cited by
A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat
Lazarus, J. V., Romero, D., Kopka, C. J., Karim, S. A., Abu-Raddad, L. J., Almeida, G., Baptista-Leite, R., Barocas, J. A., Barreto, M. L., Bar-Yam, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05398-2 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Moosavi, J., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., & Dulebenets, M. A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 75
- Pages
- 102983
- ISSN
- 2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4224305133
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 74.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983
- The paper
- Moosavi, J., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., & Dulebenets, M. A. (2022). Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.