Social comparison, resilience, life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety among earthquake survivors in Turkey
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social comparison correlated positively with depression (r = 0.23, p < 0.001) and anxiety (r = 0.22, p < 0.001), and negatively with life satisfaction (r = −0.31, p < 0.001) and resilience (r = −0.20, p < 0.01).
“Social comparison correlated positively with depression (r = 0.23, p < 0.001) and anxiety (r = 0.22, p < 0.001), and negatively with life satisfaction (r = −0.31, p < 0.001) and resilience (r = −0.20, p < 0.01)”
From Coping strategies and psychological outcomes following the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a systematic review with meta-analytic synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
One study found that a greater tendency toward social comparison was linked to higher levels of depression and anxiety and lower life satisfaction among earthquake survivors.
“For example, one study found that a greater tendency toward social comparison was linked to higher levels of depression and anxiety and lower life satisfaction among earthquake survivors (39).”
From Coping strategies and psychological outcomes following the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a systematic review with meta-analytic synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back
Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/10705500802222972 · Cited by 6,439 · see citing works
The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology
(2009) · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.001.0001 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
Chae, J. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.007 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Lewis, C., Roberts, N. P., Simon, N., Bethell, A., & Bisson, J. I. (2019) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.13079 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Hamblen, J. L., Norris, F. H., Symon, K. A., & Bow, T. E. (2017) · Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy · doi:10.1037/tra0000221 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Çınaroğlu, M., & Yılmazer, E. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1776931 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Depression and anxiety were typically evaluated using instruments such as the PHQ-9, GAD-7, or (32, 36), state hope (35), and life satisfaction (39)—to capture adaptive responses.”
- Authors
- Güler, A., Gül, S., & Yıldırım, M.
- Affiliations
- Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Güler, Abdurrahim
- Venue
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-04
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 104426
- ISSN
- 2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392974535
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Keywords
- social comparison, resilience, life satisfaction, depression, anxiety, earthquake survivors, disaster mental health, mediation, Turkey earthquake
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review