Cited by 23Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Response and ManagementDisaster Management and Resilience

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Postdisaster Distress: A Promising Transdiagnostic Approach to Treating Disaster Survivors

Hamblen, Jessica L., Norris, Fran H., Symon, Kerry A., Bow, Thomas E.·2017·Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for postdisaster distress (CBT-PD) is a transdiagnostic intervention that has been used following major disasters such as the 9/11 terrorist attacks and Hurricane Katrina. In this study, we report findings from a community-based treatment program that offered CBT-PD to individuals who experienced Hurricane Sandy. METHOD: Eight trained community therapists delivered CBT-PD to 342 adults who had been exposed to Hurricane Sandy. Participants were assessed at referral, pretreatment, intermediate treatment, posttreatment and 5-month follow-up. RESULTS: The overall prepost effect size was 1.41, indicating large improvement pre to posttreatment. Gains were maintained at follow-up. Timing of the intervention did not affect outcome. Participants who received the intervention early (i.e., 10 to 15 months after Sandy) had the same improvement as those who received it later (i.e., 21 to 26 months after Sandy). Similarly, there was no difference in outcome between individuals with severe as compared with moderate distress at pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that CBT-PD is appropriate for a range of individuals with moderate to severe distress and that it has benefit both early on as well as two years postdisaster. Findings add to growing literature that CBT-PD should be considered as one important component of a larger disaster response system. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0000221

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamblen, J. L., Norris, F. H., Symon, K. A., & Bow, T. E.
Affiliations
  • National Center for PTSD (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • VNS Health (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
Published
2017-08
Volume
9
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
130-136
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2552141039
Cited by
23
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Visiting Nurse Association of New York
  • American Red Cross
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
transdiagnostic treatment, disaster survivors, Hurricane Sandy, post-traumatic stress disorder, community-based treatment, disaster response, intervention timing, maintenance of treatment effects, community therapists
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Disasters, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Personnel, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Young Adult, Cyclonic Storms, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review