Cited by 375School Choice and PerformanceEducational Outcomes and InfluencesPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Poverty & privilege: Primary school inequality in South Africa

Spaull, Nicholas·2013·International Journal of Educational Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spaull, N.
Affiliations
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Spaull, Nicholas
Venue
International Journal of Educational Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
436-447
ISSN
0738-0593 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124259874
Cited by
375
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 10
FWCI
102.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
educational inequality, primary education, apartheid legacy, socioeconomic status, academic performance, mathematics achievement, reading achievement, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review