Cited by 4,501School Choice and PerformanceEducational Environments and Student OutcomesEarly Childhood Education and Development

Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement

Rivkin, Steven G., Hanushek, Eric A., Kain, John F.·2005·Econometrica

Abstract

This paper disentangles the impact of schools and teachers in influencing achievement with special attention given to the potential problems of omitted or mismeasured variables and of student and school selection. Unique matched panel data from the UTD Texas Schools Project permit the identification of teacher quality based on student performance along with the impact of specific, measured components of teachers and schools. Semiparametric lower bound estimates of the variance in teacher quality based entirely on within-school heterogeneity indicate that teachers have powerful effects on reading and mathematics achievement, though little of the variation in teacher quality is explained by observable characteristics such as education or experience. The results suggest that the effects of a costly ten student reduction in class size are smaller than the benefit of moving one standard deviation up the teacher quality distribution, highlighting the importance of teacher effectiveness in the determination of school quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A tenth of a standard deviation is similar in magnitude to the estimated relation between gender and reading in NAPLAN at age 8-9 and to effects estimated from improving teacher quality by one standard deviation and reducing average grade 3 class sizes by ten.

    “To put the size of these relations into perspective, a tenth of a standard deviation is similar in magnitude to the estimated relation between gender and reading in NAPLAN at age 8–9 (reported in Table S5a) and effects estimated from improving teacher quality by one standard deviation and reducing average grade 3 class sizes by ten50.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F.
Affiliations
Hoover Institution (US)
Venue
Econometrica
Published
2005-03
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
417-458
ISSN
  • 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0262
OpenAlex
W3121388701
Cited by
4,501
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 230 · 2021: 270 · 2020: 283 · 2019: 252 · 2018: 282 · 2017: 262 · 2016: 326 · 2015: 301 · 2014: 265 · 2013: 299 · 2012: 249
FWCI
587.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Econometrica (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
teacher quality, school quality, academic performance, student selection, omitted variable bias, reading achievement, mathematics achievement, class size, teacher effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review