Attention to menstrual hygiene management in schools: An analysis of education policy documents in low-and middle-income countries
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent expansions on the definition of 'menstrual hygiene' to include menstrual knowledge conflate menstrual experience with antecedents.
“Recent expansions on this definition to include menstrual knowledge conflates menstrual experience with antecedents [115].”
From Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2019) · cites this paper as [115]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Sommer, M., Figueroa, C., Kwauk, C., Jones, M., & Fyles, N.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- United Nations (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sommer, Marni
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 73-82
- ISSN
- 0738-0593 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2764133933
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Development (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- UNICEF
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
- Keywords
- menstrual hygiene management, school sanitation, education policy, gender equality in education, low- and middle-income countries, school facilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
