Cited by 20Evaluation and Performance AssessmentGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsSchool Choice and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Addressing cross-national generalizability in educational impact evaluation

Hanushek, Eric A.·2021·International Journal of Educational Development

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102318

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nelson, 1966, Investment in humans, technology diffusion and economic growth, Am. Econ. Rev., 56, 69

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hanushek, E. A.
Affiliations
Hoover Institution (US)
Corresponding author
Hanushek, Eric A.
Venue
International Journal of Educational Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
80
Pages
102318
ISSN
0738-0593 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910158608
Cited by
20
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
cross-national generalizability, educational impact evaluation, replication, academic performance, randomized controlled trials, education policy, generalizability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review