Cited by 87School Choice and PerformanceEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

Attainment Grouping as self-fulfilling prophesy? A mixed methods exploration of self confidence and set level among Year 7 students

Open access
Francis, Becky, Connolly, Paul, Archer, Louise, Hodgen, Jeremy, Mazenod, Anna, Pepper, David, Sloan, Seaneen, Taylor, Becky +2 more·2017·International Journal of Educational Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.09.001

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Setting tends to have negative effects on attainment and confidence.

    “Setting tends to have negative effects on attainment and confidence (Education Endowment Foundation, 2015;Francis et al., 2017Francis et al., , 2020))”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Francis et al., 2017

    The indexed Abstract says attainment grouping detrimentally affects outcomes for pupils in low-attainment groups and reports correlations between set placement and self-confidence. It does not establish that setting generally causes lower attainment and confidence for all pupils, as the citing sentence implies. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Francis, B., Connolly, P., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Pepper, D., Sloan, S., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Travers, M.-C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Francis, Becky
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
86
Pages
96-108
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2761450574
Cited by
87
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4
FWCI
28.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
ability grouping, self-fulfilling prophecy, self-confidence, Year 7 students, secondary education, student perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review