Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 16Fatigue and fracture mechanicsMechanical Behavior of CompositesBone health and osteoporosis research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A damage assessment model for cadaveric cortical bone subjected to fatigue cycles

Varvani-Farahani, A., Najmi, H.·2010·International Journal of Fatigue

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.08.002

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Varvani-Farahani, A., & Najmi, H.
Affiliations
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Corresponding author
Varvani-Farahani, A.
Venue
International Journal of Fatigue
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
420-427
ISSN
0142-1123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982326179
Cited by
16
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
International Journal of Fatigue (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
cortical bone, fatigue damage, damage assessment model, stiffness degradation, osteons, secant modulus, donor age, cyclic loading, cadaveric bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.