Efficacy of bacteriocin-containing cell-free culture supernatants from lactic acid bacteria to control Listeria monocytogenes in food
Abstract
Consumer demands have led to an increased interest in the use of natural antimicrobials for food protection. With the objective of developing novel products for enhancing the microbial safety of food, we have tested cell-free culture supernatants (CFS's) of eight antagonistic bacterial strains for their efficacy to inhibit Listeria monocytogenes in different food matrices. The antagonistic strains represented different members of the order Lactobacillales as well as one isolate of Staphylococcus sciuri and all showed strong inhibition of L. monocytogenes on agar plates. Cell-free supernatants were obtained after growing the bacteria in a yeast extract-glucose broth. In six of the CFS's, different class IIa bacteriocins, namely leucocin A, leucocin B, mundticin L, pediocin PA-1, sakacin A, and sakacin X, were identified as the major anti-listerial compounds. For the other two strains, the active substances could not be ascertained conclusively. The minimal effective concentration (MEC) of the individual CFS's to achieve a 2.3 log(10) reduction of L. monocytogenes was determined in culture broth, whole milk, and ground beef at 4°C. While all bacteriocin-containing CFS's were effective in broth at concentrations from 52 to 205 AU/ml, significant higher concentrations were needed when applied in food. Best results were obtained using CFS's containing pediocin PA-1, that displayed only three- and ten-times higher MEC's in milk (307 AU/ml) and ground meat (1024 AU/g) compared to broth, respectively. A twenty-fold increase in the MEC (2048 AU/ml) was observed for a mundticin L-containing fermentate, and a CFS containing leucocin A and B was inactivated more than fifty-fold (>1280 AU/ml) in both food matrices. Remarkably, the sakacin A and sakacin X containing CFS's displayed very selective inactivation rates, in which sakacin A was only effective in meat (512 AU/g), while sakacin X was only effective in milk (2048 AU/ml). In all cases, inhibition of L. monocytogenes was only transient and surviving or resistant bacteria started growing after prolonged storage. These results highlight the importance of careful testing the effectiveness of bacteriocins in the food systems for which they are intended to be applied against the selected target and non-target bacteria. Furthermore, the outgrowth of surviving or resistant bacterial populations points out that the tested bacteriocins are not suited to assure full inhibition of L. monocytogenes in a food product, if not applied in combination with additional preservative measures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
L. monocytogenes growth was inhibited in whole milk with antimicrobial compounds produced by Lactobacillus curvatus.
“L. monocytogenes growth was inhibited in whole milk with antimicrobial compounds produced by Lactobacillus curvatus [38].”
From Antimicrobial Activities and Biopreservation Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) from Raw Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Milk (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 159
- Authors
- Hartmann, H. A., Wilke, T., & Erdmann, R.
- Corresponding author
- Hartmann, H. Andreas
- ORCID
- Wilke, Thomas
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-199
- ISSN
- 0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046243062
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Keywords
- Listeria monocytogenes, bacteriocins, cell-free supernatant, lactic acid bacteria, natural antimicrobials, food safety, pediocin PA-1, Staphylococcus sciuri, whole milk, ground beef, minimal effective concentration
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteriocins, Dairy Products, Food Contamination, Food Microbiology, Lactobacillaceae, Listeria monocytogenes, Meat, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Culture Media, Conditioned
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review