The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A State-of-the-Art Review on Geothermal Energy Extraction, Utilization, and Improvement Strategies: Conventional, Hybridized, and Enhanced Geothermal Systems
Open accessAbstract
The rising population along with a growing reliance on modern technology has increased energy demand. Energy sources must be used with caution as the focus on developing a sustainable environment grows. Renewable energy technology is required to create energy resources that will be much more sustainable than today's fossil-fuel energy systems. In the past few decades, studies have indicated that utilizing geothermal energy as well as enhancing the efficiency of geothermal systems currently being used are both viable choices for addressing these challenges. Despite its constraints compared to other renewable energy sources, geothermal energy produced by Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) reduces environmental consequences and emissions of hazardous gases. Besides, the direct applications of geothermal energy for domestic and commercial use, as well as power generation in a variety of power plant setups, both are significantly beneficial. In the current study, an intricate review is conducted regarding the respective topics in terms of energy growth, evaluating the technologies implemented in power plants and direct heat applications based on which the benefits and drawbacks of geothermal technology as well as the areas for growth are described. Moreover, for performance enhancement of the existing conventional systems, the implementation of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) and Hybridized Geothermal Systems (HGS) has been suggested as the viable alternatives in this review article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2015 worldwide review
Lund, J. W., & Boyd, T. L. (2016) · Geothermics · doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.11.004 · Cited by 1,424
Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview
Barbier, E. (2002) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/s1364-0321(02)00002-3 · Cited by 1,218
Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2020 worldwide review
Lund, J. W., & Toth, A. N. (2021) · Geothermics · doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101915 · Cited by 924
Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A review
Olasolo, P., Juárez, M. C., Morales, M. P., D´Amico, S., & Liarte, I. A. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.031 · Cited by 817
A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)
Lu, S.-M. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.097 · Cited by 788
Pruess, K. (2006) · Geothermics · doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2006.08.002 · Cited by 758
Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2010 worldwide review
Lund, J., Freeston, D. H., & Boyd, T. L. (2011) · Geothermics · doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2011.07.004 · Cited by 592
Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people
Fridleifsson, I. B. (2001) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/s1364-0321(01)00002-8 · Cited by 537
Efficiency of geothermal power plants: A worldwide review
Zarrouk, S. J., & Moon, H. (2014) · Geothermics · doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.11.001 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharmin, T., Khan, N. R., Akram, M. S., & Ehsan, M. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Thermofluids
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 100323
- ISSN
- 2666-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4323350442
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A State-of-the-Art Review on Geothermal Energy Extraction, Utilization, and Improvement Strategies: Conventional, Hybridized, and Enhanced Geothermal Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100323
- The paper
- Sharmin, T., Khan, N. R., Akram, M. S., & Ehsan, M. M. (2023). A State-of-the-Art Review on Geothermal Energy Extraction, Utilization, and Improvement Strategies: Conventional, Hybridized, and Enhanced Geothermal Systems. International Journal of Thermofluids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
