The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wellbore integrity analysis of a natural CO2 producer
Abstract
Abstract The long-term integrity of wellbores in a CO2-rich environment is a complex function of material properties and reservoir conditions including brine and rock compositions, CO2 pressure, and formation pressure and temperature gradients. Laboratory experiments can provide essential information on rates of material reaction with CO2. However, field data are essential for assessing the integrated effect of these factors in subsurface conditions to provide a basis for validation of numerical models of wellbore behavior. We present a comprehensive study and conclusions from an investigation of a 30-year old well from a natural CO2 production reservoir. The wellbore was exposed to a 96% CO2 fluid from the time of cement placement. This site is unique for two reasons: it represents a higher, sustained concentration of CO2 compared to enhanced oil recovery fields and both the reservoir and caprock are clastic rocks that may possess less buffering capacity than carbonate reservoirs. A sampling program resulted in the recovery of 10 side-wall cement cores extending from the reservoir through the caprock. The hydrologic, mineralogical and mechanical properties of these samples were measured and those results were combined with an in-situ pressure-response test to investigate cement integrity over a range of length scales. Fluid sampling was conducted with pressure and temperature measurements for geochemical analysis of the cemented annulus and the adjacent formation. These combined data sets provide an assessment of well integrity including original cement seal and the impacts of CO2. Cement evaluation wireline surveys indicate good coverage and bonding, consistent with observations from sidewall cement core samples that have tight interfaces with the casing and formation. Although alteration of the cement samples is present in all cores in varying degrees, hydraulic isolation has prevented leakage based on the pressure gradient measured between the caprock and CO2 formation as well as lack of corrosion and no casing pressure history. Simulation of a hydraulic isolation test (Vertical Interference Test) indicates the best match for effective permeability of the wellbore system is approximately 1–10 millidarcies which suggests cement interfaces are a more significant potential migration pathway as compared with the cement matrix. Effective placement of the Portland-fly ash cement system was a key element in the observed performance of the barrier system that provides hydraulic isolation. The types of information collected in this survey permit analysis of individual components (casing, cement and reservoir fluid and pressure measurements) for comparison to the larger scale system including the interfaces. The results will be used as part of the CO2 Capture Project’s effort to develop a long-term predictive simulation tool to assess wellbore integrity performance in CO2 storage sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Nanoscale Basis of CO2 Trapping for Geologic Storage
Bourg, I. C., Beckingham, L. E., & DePaolo, D. J. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03003 · Cited by 163
Choi, Y.-S., Young, D., Nešić, S., & Gray, L. G. S. (2013) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.028 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Crow, W., Carey, J. W., Gasda, S., Brian Williams, D., & Celia, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-197
- ISSN
- 1750-5836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142351601
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wellbore integrity analysis of a natural CO2 producer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.010
- The paper
- Crow, W., Carey, J. W., Gasda, S., Brian Williams, D., & Celia, M. (2010). Wellbore integrity analysis of a natural CO2 producer. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.