Life cycle and cost assessment of mineral carbonation for carbon capture and storage in European power generation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Life cycle assessment on the cost of the full chain of CCS process is commonly adopted to evaluate the feasibility of a CCS project.
“Life cycle assessment on the cost of the full chain of CCS process is commonly adopted to evaluate the feasibility of a CCS project [28,74,120,121].”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [120]
Cites
CO2 disposal by means of silicates
SEIFRITZ, W. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/345486b0 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Impact of alkalinity sources on the life-cycle energy efficiency of mineral carbonation technologies
Kirchofer, A., Brandt, A., Krevor, S., Prigiobbe, V., & Wilcox, J. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22180b · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review
Li, J., Hitch, M., Power, I., & Pan, Y. (2018) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min8040147 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“Life cycle assessment on the cost of the full chain of CCS process is commonly adopted to evaluate the feasibility of a CCS project [28,74,120,121].”
MethodAssessing Early‐Stage CO<sub>2</sub> utilization Technologies—Comparing Apples and Oranges?
Zimmermann, A. W., & Schomäcker, R. (2017) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.201600805 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Serpentinite Carbonation Process Routes using Ammonium Sulfate and Integration in Industry
Zevenhoven, R., Slotte, M., Koivisto, E., & Erlund, R. (2017) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.201600702 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Towards a Framework for Discussing and Assessing CO2 Utilisation in a Climate Context
Bennett, S. J., Schroeder, D. J., & McCoy, S. T. (2014) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.835 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Giannoulakis, S., Volkart, K., & Bauer, C.
- Affiliations
- Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Volkart, Kathrin
- Venue
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 140-157
- ISSN
- 1750-5836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016704215
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International journal of greenhouse gas control (publishedVersion)
- DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Competence Centers of Environment and Sustainability (CCES)
- Energy and Mobility (CCEM)
- Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE)
- Alstom power service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- CO2 mineralization, carbon capture and storage, CO2 sequestration, life cycle assessment, levelized cost of electricity, electricity generation, greenhouse gas emissions, CO2 leakage, CO2 geological storage, calcium silicate, magnesium silicate, fossil fuel power plants, European climate policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review