CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Serpentinite Carbonation Process Routes using Ammonium Sulfate and Integration in Industry

Open access
Zevenhoven, Ron, Slotte, Martin, Koivisto, Evelina, Erlund, Rickard·2017·Energy Technology
DOI 10.1002/ente.201600702
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Vast resources of serpenitinite rock available worldwide are capable of binding CO 2 amounts that diminish the capacity of methods based on geological storage of CO 2. R&D has been ongoing in Finland for many years on developing large‐scale application of process routes for serpentinite carbonation. Several routes have been assessed in the laboratory, in all cases using ammonium salts to extract magnesium from rock followed by carbonation either in a gas/solid reactor at elevated temperatures and pressures or in an aqueous solution at ambient conditions. The choice for either route is motivated by the CO 2‐producing source, (waste) heat availability, the magnesium (hydro‐)carbonate product aimed at, and a preference for energy efficiency or simplicity. Rocks from several locations have been analysed. A special issue is the recovery of the ammonium flux salt, typically from an aqueous solution. As for application, several industry sectors are considered, such as a (natural gas fired) power plant, a lime kiln, or iron‐ and steelmaking, applying mineral carbonation (MC) to blast furnace top gas. The analysis includes life cycle assessment (LCA). Finally, the use of magnesium (hydro‐)carbonates for heat storage is addressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ente.201600702

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mg silicate minerals have been considered the most feasible feedstock for carbon capture and utilization/storage by mineral carbonation due to their high abundance in ultramaphic rocks or inorganic industrial side-streams, especially mining tailings.

    “Mg silicate minerals have been considered the most feasible feedstock for carbon capture and utilization/storage by mineral carbonation due to their high abundance in ultramaphic rocks or inorganic industrial side-streams, especially mining tailings.1,3”

    From Mechanisms of Mg carbonates precipitation and implications for CO <sub>2</sub> capture and utilization/storage (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The ÅA routes developed in Finland have achieved relevant progresses in lowering the energy demands and reagent consumption in the process of Mg extraction and carbonates, being demonstrated technology readiness level (TRL) 5-6 for the wet carbonation route.

    “The ÅA routes developed in Finland have achieved relevant progresses in lowering the energy demands and reagent consumption in the process of Mg extraction and carbonates, being demonstrated technology readiness level (TRL) 5-6 for the wet carbonation route.1,167”

    From Mechanisms of Mg carbonates precipitation and implications for CO <sub>2</sub> capture and utilization/storage (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. [2]2. K. S. Lackner, Science 2003, 300,1677 -1678.
  2. [3]3. R. Zevenhoven, J. Fagerlund, J. K. Songok, GreenhouseG ases Sci. Technol. 2011, 1,48-57.
  3. [4]4. R. Zevenhoven, I. S. Rom¼o, CO 2 Sequestrationb yE x-Situ Mineral Carbonation (Eds.A .S anna, M. M. Maroto-Valer), World Scientific, London, 2017,c hap.3.
  4. [5]5. H. Geerlings,R .Z evenhoven, Annu. Rev.C hem. Biomol. Eng. 2013, 4,103 -117.
  5. [6]6. K. Armstrong,P .S tryring, Front. EnergyRes. 2015, 3,8.
  6. [7]7. T. Koljonen, H. Siikavirta, R. Zevenhoven, I. Savolainen, Energy 2004, 29,1 521 -1527.
  7. [8]8. J. Fagerlund, Carbonationo fM g(OH) 2 in aP ressurized Fluidized Bed for CO 2 Sequestration,P hD thesis,T urku, Finland, bo Akade- mi University, 2012,h ttp://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201311267415,a c- cessed2 0J anuary 2017.
  8. [9]9. E. Nduagu,P roduction of Mg(OH) 2 from Mg silicate rock for CO 2 minerals equestration, PhD thesis,T urku, Finland, bo Akademi University, 2012,h ttp://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201311117327, accessed 20 January 2017.
  9. [10]10. I. Rom¼o, Production of magnesium carbonates from serpentinites for CO 2 mineralsequestration:o ptimisationtowards industriala pplica- tion,P hD thesis,T urku, Finland, bo Akademi University &C oim- bra, Portugal, University of Coimbra, 2015,h ttp://www.doria.fi/ handle/10024/117766, accessed2 0J anuary 2017.
  10. [11]11. A. Sanna, M. Uibu, G. Caramanna, R. Kuusik,M .M.M aroto-Valer, Chem.Soc. Rev. 2014, 43,8049 -8080.
  11. [12]12. H.-P.M attila, R. Zevenhoven, Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 66-CO 2 Chemistry (Eds.R .v an Eldik, M. Aresta), Academic, BurlingtonM A, 2014,chap.10.
  12. [13]13. V. Romanov,Y .S oong, C. Carney, G. E. Rush, B. Nielsen,W .O Con- nor, ChemBioEng Rev. 2015, 2,2 31 -256.
  13. [14]14. I. Rom¼o, E. Nduagu, J. Fagerlund, L. M. Gando-Ferreira, R. Zeven- hoven, Energy 2012, 41,2 03 -211.
  14. [15]15. R. Zevenhoven, S. Teir, S. Eloneva, Energy 2008, 33,3 62 -370.
  15. [16]16. E. Nduagu, I. Rom¼o, J. Fagerlund, R. Zevenhoven, Appl. Energy 2013, 106,1 16 -126.
  16. [17]17. J. Fagerlund, R. Zevenhoven, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5, 1406 -1412.
  17. [18]18. J. Fagerlund, J. G. Highfield, R. Zevenhoven, RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 10380 -10393.
  18. [19]19. R. Zevenhoven, J. Fagerlund, T. Bjçrklçf,M .M äkelä,O .E klund, Proc.ofECOS'2012,P erugia, Italy,J une 2012,paper 179.
  19. [20]20. R. Zevenhoven, J. Fagerlund, E. Nduagu,I ,R om¼o, J. Bu, J. High- field, EnergyProcedia 2013, 37,5945 -5954.
  20. [22]22. H. H. Khoo, P. N. Sharatt, J. Bu, A. Borgna, T. Y. Yeo, J. Highfield, T. G. Bjçrklçf,R .Z evenhoven, Ind. Eng. Chem.R es. 2011, 50, 11350 -11357.
  21. [23]23. S. Giannoulakis, K. Volkart, C. Bauer, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2014, 21,1 40 -157.
  22. [24]24. M. Slotte,I.R om¼o, R. Zevenhoven, Energy 2013, 62,1 42 -149.
  23. [25]25. I. Stasiulaitiene,V .V ajegaite,D .M artuzevicius,G .D enafas,S .S liau- pa, J. Fagerlund, R. Zevenhoven, Environ. Prog.S ustainable Energy 2014, 33,5 12 -518.
  24. [26]26. I. S. Rom¼o, L. M. Gando-Ferreira,M .M.V .G .d aSilva, R. Zeven- hoven, Miner.E ng. 2016, 94,104 -114.
  25. [27]27. R. Zevenhoven, M. Slotte,J .backa,J .H ighfield, Energy 2016, 117, 604 -611.
  26. [28]28. I. Rom¼o, M. Slotte,L .M.G ando-Ferreira, R. Zevenhoven, Chem. Eng.Res.D es. 2014, 92,3072 -3082.
  27. [29]29. R. J. Hill, J. H. Canterford, F. J. Moyle, Mineral.M ag. 1982, 46,4 53 - 457.
  28. [30]30. R. J. Hunwick, Mod. Power Syst. 2009, 29,25.
  29. [31]31. X. Wang, M. M. Maroto-Valer, Fuel 2011, 90,1229 -1237.
  30. [32]32. A. Sanna, M. Dri, M. M. Maroto-Valer, Fuel 2013, 114,1 53 -161.
  31. [33]33. J. backa, Low Temperature Carbonationo fM agnesium Hydroxide and Sulfate,M Sc thesis, Tu rku, Finland, bo Akademi University, 2013.
  32. [35]35. M. Slotte, Tw oC ase Studies on Energy Efficiency, Life Cycle Assess- ment and Process Scale-up,P hD thesis,T urku,F inland, bo Akade- mi University, 2017,h ttp://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-12-3490-3, ac- cessed2 0J anuary 2017.
  33. [36]36. E. Nduagu, J. Bergerson, R. Zevenhoven, Energy Convers.M anage. 2012, 55,1 16 -126.
  34. [37]37. L.-C.P asquier, G. Mercier, J.-F.B lais,E .C ecchi,S .K entish, Int. J. GreenhouseG as Control 2016, 50,147 -157.
  35. [38]38. S. J. Gerdemann, W. K. OConnor, D. C. Dahlin,L. R. Penner,H . Rush, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41,2 587 -2593.
  36. [40]40. E. Koivisto,R .E rlund, M. Fagerholm, R. Zevenhoven, Hydrometal- lurgy 2016, 166,2 22 -228.
  37. [41]41. R. Erlund, E. Koivisto,M .F agerholm, R. Zevenhoven, Hydrometal- lurgy 2016, 166,2 29 -236.
  38. [42]42. S. Lavikko, O. Eklund, Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 152,7-15.
  39. [43]43. A. Sanna, J. Gaubert, M. M. Maroto-Valer, Chem.E ng. J. 2016, 306, 1049 -1057.
  40. [45]45. R. Zevenhoven, MV irtanenin Proc. of CPOTE-2016,K atowice, Poland,Sept. 2016,p p. 919 -927, also submitted.
  41. [46]46. R. Erlund, R. Zevenhoven in Proc. of CPOTE-2016,K atowice, Poland,S ept. 2016,p p. 323 -331 also acceptedf or publication in Int. J. Thermodyn.
  42. [47]47. E. I. Nduagu, J. Highfield, J. Chen,R .Z evenhoven, RSC Adv. 2014, 4,64494 -64505.
  43. [48]48. M. Margni, R. Charles,S .H umbert, J. Payet, G. Rebitzer, R. Rosen- baum, O. Jolliet, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2003, 8,3 24 -330. Manuscript received:November 8, 2016 Revised manuscript received:J anuary 20, 2017 Acceptedmanuscript online:J anuary 26, 2017 Version of recordonline:March 22, 2017 Energy Technol. 2017, 5, 945 -954 2017Wiley-VCH &Co. ,W einheim

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Zevenhoven, R., Slotte, M., Koivisto, E., & Erlund, R.
Affiliations
Åbo Akademi University (FI)
Corresponding author
Zevenhoven, Ron
ORCID
Venue
Energy Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-22
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
945-954
ISSN
  • 2194-4288 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-4296
DOI
10.1002/ente.201600702
OpenAlex
W2580795354
Cited by
50
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Energy Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
CO2 mineralization, CO2 geological storage, ammonium sulfate, magnesium extraction, magnesium carbonate, ammonium recovery, gas-solid reactors, lime kiln, steel industry, thermal energy storage, life cycle assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review