Negative CO2 emissions - An analysis of the retention times required with respect to possible carbon leakage
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Over various time scales of leakage and assuming that 80% carbon was permanently stored, the leakage to the environment from negative emissions technologies was negligible at 3 parts per million CO2.
“The results indicated that over various time scales of leakage and assuming that 80% carbon was permanently stored, the leakage to the environment was negligible at 3 parts per million CO2 (Lyngfelt et al. 2019).”
From Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review (2022) · cites this paper as Lyngfelt et al. 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- J. Rogelj, D. Shindell, and K. Jiang. Chapter 2: Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development, in IPCC report "Global Warming of 1.5°C", http://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_chapter2.pdf. 2018.
- D. Archer, H. Kheshgi, and E. Maier-Reimer. Multiple timescales for neutralization of fossil fuel CO2. Geophysical Research Letters 1997; 24:405-408.
- Authors
- Lyngfelt, A., Johansson, D. J. A., & Lindeberg, E.
- Affiliations
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- SINTEF (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Lyngfelt, Anders
- Venue
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 27-33
- ISSN
- 1750-5836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2945216070
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- International journal of greenhouse gas control (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nordic Energy Research
- Vetenskapsrådet (2015-2019, 2016-06023, 77,732)
- Energimyndigheten
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Keywords
- negative CO2 emissions, carbon leakage, retention time, negative emissions technologies, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, afforestation and reforestation, biochar, enhanced weathering, direct air capture, carbon storage, atmospheric CO2 concentration, climate targets, Paris Agreement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
