Contribution of obstetrics and gynecology societies in South America to the prevention of unsafe abortion in the region
Open accessAbstract
Unsafe abortion is one of the most serious public health and human rights issues in South America. Rates are among the highest in the world and account for 13% of maternal deaths. Nine out of 10 South American countries have enrolled in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative for the Prevention of Unsafe Abortion and its Consequences. Each individual society of obstetrics and gynecology prepared a situational analysis, and an action plan was elaborated with the participation of their respective Ministries of Health, national and international agencies, and other collaborating institutions. Action plans were designed to respond to the problems identified in the situational analyses, with objectives corresponding with all or some of the 4 levels of prevention proposed in the FIGO initiative. This article reports the progress achieved in implementing the action proposed by each country, as well as some activities carried out in addition to those included in the formal plans.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All assessed societies took part in the previous prevention of unsafe abortions initiative.
“All assessed societies took part in the previous “prevention of unsafe abortions” initiative.3, 4, 5”
From Advocating safe abortion: outcomes of a multi‐country needs assessment on the potential role of national societies of obstetrics and gynecology (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Trends in maternal mortality, 1990–2008
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, Bank, W., & Division, U. N. P. (2011) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00406.x · Cited by 1,593 · see citing works
The World Health Report 2005 - make every mother and child count
Lerberghe, W. V., Manuel, A., Matthews, Z., & Wolfheim, C. (2005) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
The World Health Report 2005 - Make Every Mother and Child Count
Farooqi, S. S. (2005) · Annals of Saudi Medicine · doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2005.516 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Åhman, E. L., & Shah, I. (2004) · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Make every mother and child count.
Spencer-Jones, J. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 523 · see citing works
(2009) · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Unsafe abortion in 2008: global and regional levels and trends
Shah, I., & Åhman, E. L. (2010) · Reproductive Health Matters · doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(10)36537-2 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Högberg, U. (2005) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Surgical procedures for evacuating incomplete miscarriage
Tunçalp, Ö., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Souza, J. P. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001993.pub2 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Recent trends in abortion and contraception in 12 countries
Westoff, C. F. (2005) · Cited by 85 · see citing works
A risk reduction strategy to prevent maternal deaths associated with unsafe abortion
Briozzo, L., Vidiella, G., Rodríguez, F., Gorgoroso, M., Faúndes, A., & Pons, J. E. (2006) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.07.013 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Sexual and reproductive health needs of young people: Matching needs with systems
Braeken, D., & Rondinelli, I. (2012) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.019 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Strategies for the prevention of unsafe abortion
Faúndes, A. (2012) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.021 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The FIGO initiative for the prevention of unsafe abortion
Shaw, D. (2010) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.004 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
The legal status of emergency contraception in Latin America
Hevia, M. (2011) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.10.008 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The FIGO Working Group on the Prevention of Unsafe Abortion: Mandate and process for achievement
LEKE, R. J. I., de Gil, M. P., Távara, L., & Faúndes, A. (2010) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.005 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zaidi, S., Hassan, E. O., Hodorogea, S., LEKE, R. J. I., Távara, L., & de Gil, M. P. (2010) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.007 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The role of FIGO in women's health and reducing reproductive morbidity and mortality
Serour, G. I. (2012) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.007 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
de Vries, I., van Keizerswaard, L. J., Tolboom, B., Bulthuis, S., van der Kwaak, A., Tank, J., & de Koning, K. (2020) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.13092 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Advocacy opportunities on safe abortion are diverse across countries as they depend on various factors, namely: (1) existent legal frameworks, (2) the stage of public debate and discourse around abortion, and (3) the role and strength of multiple key stakeholders for safe abortion.”
BackgroundMorris, J. L., Armitage, S., Davis, J., Kaur, J., Pretty, M., Ea, S., Seok, J., & de Vries, I. (2024) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.15334 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Arendt, K. W. (2015) · International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.12.003 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Cleverley, K., Sergeant, A., Zamberlín, N., Medina, S., Tam, G., & Gill, R. K. (2024) · Frontiers in Global Women s Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1401779 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Palacios, M. C., Flores, Y. D. V. M., Maria Alejandra Santiago Villegas, & Pinto, J. F. (2021) · Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecología de Venezuela · doi:10.51288/00810204 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Tendência das internações hospitalares por complicações de aborto no Brasil, 2000-2015
Freitas, S. N. B., Rufino, A. C., & Madeiro, A. P. (2020) · Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde · doi:10.25248/reas.e4526.2020 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tavara, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-31
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S7-9
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- OpenAlex
- W2057174274
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- unsafe abortion, abortion prevention, obstetrics and gynecology society, levels of prevention, action plan, situation analysis, maternal mortality, South America, health policy implementation
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Induced, Female, Gynecology, Humans, Human Rights, International Agencies, International Cooperation, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Public Health, Societies, Medical, South America, Reproductive Health Services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review