Cited by 33Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentReproductive tract infections researchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The cost‐effectiveness of 10 antenatal syphilis screening and treatment approaches in Peru, Tanzania, and Zambia

Open access
Terris‐Prestholt, Fern, Vickerman, Peter, Torres‐Rueda, Sergio, Santesso, Nancy, Sweeney, Sedona, Mallma, Patricia, Shelley, Katharine D., Garcia, Patricia J. +8 more·2015·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objective: Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) is frequently used to test women for maternal syphilis. Rapid syphilis immunochromatographic strip tests detecting only Treponema pallidum antibodies (single RSTs) or both treponemal and non‐treponemal antibodies (dual RSTs) are now available. This study assessed the cost‐effectiveness of algorithms using these tests to screen pregnant women. Methods: Observed costs of maternal syphilis screening and treatment using clinic‐based RPR and single RSTs in 20 clinics across Peru, Tanzania, and Zambia were used to model the cost‐effectiveness of algorithms using combinations of RPR, single, and dual RSTs, and no and mass treatment. Sensitivity analyses determined drivers of key results. Results: Although this analysis found screening using RPR to be relatively cheap, most (> 70%) true cases went untreated. Algorithms using single RSTs were the most cost‐effective in all observed settings, followed by dual RSTs, which became the most cost‐effective if dual RST costs were halved. Single test algorithms dominated most sequential testing algorithms, although sequential algorithms reduced overtreatment. Mass treatment was relatively cheap and effective in the absence of screening supplies, though treated many uninfected women. Conclusion: This analysis highlights the advantages of introducing RSTs in three diverse settings. The results should be applicable to other similar settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.007

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies reported that dual treponemal/non-treponemal RDTs were more cost-effective and potentially cost saving if used in settings providing antenatal care.

    “Two studies reporting on cost–effectiveness were identified by the evidence review and reported that RDTs were more cost-effective and potentially cost saving if used in settings providing antenatal care (55, 56).”

    From Updated recommendations for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Treponema pallidum (syphilis) and new recommendations on syphilis testing and partner services (2024) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Results (Cost-effectiveness; page unavailable) support cost-effectiveness of rapid tests in antenatal care, but say single treponemal RSTs were the most cost-effective in all three countries; dual tests were less cost-effective at their current price. The reported cost saving in Peru was for switching to a single RST, not a dual test. Dual RSTs became the most cost-effective only if their price was halved (Abstract, Results). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Shelley Katharine D. Ansbro Éimhín M. Ncube Alexander Tshaka Phiri Anne Sweeney Sedona Fleisher Colette Mumba Grace Tembo Gill Michelle M. Strasser Susan Peeling Rosanna W. Terris-Prestholt Fern Integrating point-of-care syphilis testing into antenatal care in Zambia: An economic evaluation to compare cost and quality differences between pilot and national rollout implementation PLoS One 2015 (In Press) PMC4430530 25970443

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Terris‐Prestholt, F., Vickerman, P., Torres‐Rueda, S., Santesso, N., Sweeney, S., Mallma, P., Shelley, K. D., Garcia, P. J., Bronzan, R., Gill, M. M., Broutet, N., Wi, T., Watts, C., Mabey, D., Peeling, R. W., & Newman, L.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Health & Development International (US)
  • Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Terris‐Prestholt, Fern
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-29
Volume
130
Issue
S1
Pages
S73-80
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W1965812760
Cited by
32
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (47697)
  • Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
antenatal syphilis screening, maternal syphilis, cost-effectiveness, RPR, immunochromatographic strip test, Treponema pallidum antibodies, screening algorithm, mass treatment, pregnant women, Peru, Tanzania, Zambia
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Peru, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Prenatal Diagnosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Syphilis, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Tanzania, Zambia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review