The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Creativity or creativities?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Nature of Creativity
(2006) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10 · Cited by 1,496
RetractedFrames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
Klitgaard, R., & Gardner, H. (1984) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324560 · Cited by 13,636
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912281589 · Cited by 5,397
Guilford, J. P. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0063487 · Cited by 3,588
Human cognitive abilities a survey of factor-analytic studies
Carroll, J. B. (2004) · Cited by 3,394
Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-5804 · Cited by 3,019
Duncker, K. (1945) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093599 · Cited by 2,938
Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence
Clarke, A. M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121332 · Cited by 2,866
Self-citationKoestler, A. (1967) · Brain Function, Volume IV: Brain Function and Learning · doi:10.1525/9780520340176-014 · Cited by 2,631
Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes
Campbell, D. T. (1960) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040373 · Cited by 2,329
Cited by
Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010) · The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511763205.005 · Cited by 447
Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature
Mullet, D. R., Willerson, A., N. Lamb, K., & Kettler, T. (2016) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.001 · Cited by 294
Creative Writing with a Machine in the Loop: Case Studies on Slogans and Stories
Clark, E., Ross, A. S., Tan, C., Ji, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2018) · 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3172944.3172983 · Cited by 257
Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: The question of its construct validity
Almeida, L. S., Prieto, L. P., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003 · Cited by 231
Having a creative day: understanding entrepreneurs' daily idea generation through a recovery lens
Weinberger, E., Wach, D., Stephan, U., & Wegge, J. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.001 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Sternberg, R. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 370-382
- ISSN
- 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021538962
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creativity or creativities? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.003
- The paper
- Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
