CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A virtual tourist counselor expressing intimacy behaviors: A new perspective to create emotion in visitors and offer them a better user experience?

Potdevin, Delphine, Clavel, Céline, Sabouret, Nicolas·2021·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102612
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102612

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Aranyi, 2015, Modeling user experience with news websites, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 66, 2471, 10.1002/asi.23348 · DOI
  2. Argyle, 1965, Eye-contact, distance and affiliation, Sociometry, 289, 10.2307/2786027 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bailenson, 2003, Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 29, 819, 10.1177/0146167203029007002 · DOI
  4. Bailenson, 2005, The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments, Presence Teleopera. Virtual Environ., 14, 379, 10.1162/105474605774785235 · DOI
  5. Biocca, 2002, Defining and measuring social presence: contribution to the networked minds theory and measure, Proc. PRESENCE, 2002, 1
  6. Biocca, 2003, Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria, Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 12, 456, 10.1162/105474603322761270 · DOI
  7. Burgoon, 1999, Nonverbal cues and interpersonal judgments: participant and observer perceptions of intimacy, dominance, composure, and formality, Commun. Monographs, 66, 105, 10.1080/03637759909376467 · DOI
  8. Campos-Castillo, 2013, Copresence: revisiting a building block for social interaction theories, Sociol. Theory, 31, 168, 10.1177/0735275113489811 · DOI
  9. Cerekovic, 2016, Rapport with virtual agents: what do human social cues and personality explain?, IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput., 8, 382, 10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2545650 · DOI
  10. Dudley, 2014, Vol. 142
  11. Flanagan, 2003, Action plans used in action observation, Nature, 424, 769, 10.1038/nature01861 · DOI
  12. Frijda, 1988, The laws of emotion., Am. Psychol., 43, 349, 10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349 · DOI
  13. Gunawardena, 1997, Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment, Am. J. Distance Educ., 11, 8, 10.1080/08923649709526970 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hassenzahl, 2007, The hedonic/pragmatic model of user experience, vol. 10
  15. Hatfield, 1992, Primitive emotional contagion, Rev. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 14, 151
  16. Jokinen, 2015, Emotional user experience: traits, events, and states, Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 76, 67, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.12.006 · DOI
  17. Kang, 2012, Towards building a virtual counselor: modeling nonverbal behavior during intimate self-disclosure, 63, 10.65109/RZEC3541 · DOI
  18. Kim, 2003, Designing emotionally evocative homepages: an empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions, Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 59, 899, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.06.002 · DOI
  19. Lazarus, R. S., 2001. Relational meaning and discrete emotions. · DOI
  20. Lee, 2017, Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation: effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity, Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 103, 95, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lomanowska, 2016, Online intimacy and well-being in the digital age, Internet Interv., 4, 138, 10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.005 · DOI
  22. Mimoun, 2015, A valued agent: how ECAs affect website customers’ satisfaction and behaviors, J. Retailing Consum. Serv., 26, 70, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.05.008 · DOI
  23. Minge, 2016, Developing and validating an english version of the meCUE questionnaire for measuring user experience, Vol. 60, 2063
  24. Moors, 2013, Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development, Emotion Rev., 5, 119, 10.1177/1754073912468165 · DOI
  25. Morton, 1978, Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: a comparison of spouses and strangers., J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 36, 72, 10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.72 · DOI
  26. Norman, 1991, Cognitive artifacts, Designing Interact. Psychol.Hum.-Comput. Interface, 1, 17
  27. Porat, 2012, It’s a pleasure buying here: the effects of web-store design on consumers’ emotions and attitudes, Hum.-Comput. Interact., 27, 235, 10.1080/07370024.2011.646927 · DOI
  28. Potdevin, 2020, Virtual intimacy in human-embodied conversational agent interactions. the influence of multimodality on its perception., Journal on MultimodalUser Interfaces
  29. Potdevin, 2020, Intimacy perception: Does the artificial or human nature of the interlocutor matter?, Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 102464, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102464 · DOI
  30. Reis, 1988, Intimacy as an interpersonal process, Handb. Pers. Relat., 24, 367
  31. Scherer, 2009, The dynamic architecture of emotion: evidence for the component process model, Cognit. Emotion, 23, 1307, 10.1080/02699930902928969 · DOI
  32. Schoenewolf, 1990, Emotional contagion: behavioral induction in individuals and groups, Mod. Psychoanal., 15, 49
  33. Seo, 2016, Effects of perceived usability and aesthetics on emotional responses in different contexts of use, Int. J. Hum.-Comput.Interact., 32, 445, 10.1080/10447318.2016.1160537 · DOI
  34. Seo, 2015, Users’ emotional valence, arousal, and engagement based on perceived usability and aesthetics for web sites, Int. J. Hum.-Comput.Interact., 31, 72, 10.1080/10447318.2014.959103 · DOI
  35. Stafford, 1991, Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics, J. Soc. Pers. Relat., 8, 217, 10.1177/0265407591082004 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Stern, 1997, Advertising intimacy: relationship marketing and the services consumer, J. Advertising, 26, 7, 10.1080/00913367.1997.10673532 · DOI
  37. Timmerman, 1991, A concept analysis of intimacy, Issues Mental Health Nurs., 12, 19, 10.3109/01612849109058207 · DOI
  38. Verhagen, 2014, Virtual customer service agents: using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters, J. Comput.-Mediated Commun., 19, 529, 10.1111/jcc4.12066 · DOI
  39. Wang, 2015, Actor-recipient role affects neural responses to self in emotional situations, Front. Behav. Neurosci., 9, 83, 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00083 · DOI
  40. Zhao, 2003, Toward a taxonomy of copresence, Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 12, 445, 10.1162/105474603322761261 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Potdevin, D., Clavel, C., & Sabouret, N.
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
150
Pages
102612
ISSN
1071-5819
DOI
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102612
Cited by
28
References
7
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie (CIFRE 2016/0722)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review