Cited by 564Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach.

Laurenceau, Jean-Philippe, Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Rovine, Michael J.·2005·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

This study used daily reports of interactions in marriage to examine predictions from the conceptualization of intimacy as the outcome of an interpersonal process. Both partners of 96 married couples completed daily diaries assessing self-disclosure, partner disclosure, perceived partner responsiveness, and intimacy on each of 42 consecutive days. Multivariate multilevel modeling revealed that self-disclosure and partner disclosure both significantly and uniquely contributed to the contemporaneous prediction of intimacy. Perceived partner responsiveness partially mediated the effects of self-disclosure and partner disclosure on intimacy. Global marital satisfaction, relationship intimacy, and demand-withdraw communication were related to daily levels of intimacy. Implications for the importance of perceived partner responsiveness in the intimacy process for married partners are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large number of chronic pain patients think that other people fail to understand their pain or regard it as legitimate.

    “Many patients with chronic pain believe that others do not understand their pain or even consider their pain condition to be legitimate[9]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Boston College (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2005
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
314-323
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W1985106592
Cited by
564
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
12.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03mh058017-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1R03MH58017)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
marital intimacy, self-disclosure, partner disclosure, perceived partner responsiveness, mediation, marital satisfaction, married couples
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Communication, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Self Disclosure, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review