Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Simple Model to Predict Mass Transfer Rates and Kinetics of Biochemical and Biomedical Michaelis-Menten Surface Reactions

Pallares, Jordi, Ferré, Josep Anton·2015·International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.09.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Kuharsky, 2001, Surface-mediated control of blood coagulation: the role of binding site densities and platelet deposition, Biophys. J., 80, 1050, 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76085-7 · DOI
  2. Hildebrand, 2006, Surface coatings for biological activation and functionalization of medical devices, Surf. Coat. Technol., 200, 6318, 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.086 · DOI
  3. Asanomi, 2011, Enzyme-immobilized microfluidic process reactors, Molecules, 16, 6041, 10.3390/molecules16076041 · DOI
  4. Yamaguchi, 2013, Enzyme-immobilized reactors for rapid and efficient sample preparation in MS-based proteomic studies, Proteomics, 13, 457, 10.1002/pmic.201200272 · DOI
  5. Liese, 2013, Evaluation of immobilized enzymes for industrial applications, Chem. Soc. Rev., 42, 6236, 10.1039/c3cs35511j · DOI
  6. Anne, 2012, Kinetics of enzyme action on surface-attached substrates: a practical guide to progress curve analysis in any kinetic situation, Langmuir, 28, 14665, 10.1021/la3030827 · DOI
  7. He, 2010, Development of enzyme immobilized monolith micro-reactors integrated with microfluidic electrochemical cell for the evaluation of enzyme kinetics, Microfluid. Nanofluid., 8, 565, 10.1007/s10404-009-0476-8 · DOI
  8. Kerby, 2006, Measurements of kinetic parameters in a microfluidic reactor, Anal. Chem., 78, 8273, 10.1021/ac061189l · DOI
  9. Mao, 2002, Design and characterization of immobilized enzymes in microfluidic systems, Anal. Chem., 74, 379, 10.1021/ac010822u · DOI
  10. Gleason, 2004, Measurement of enzyme kinetics using microscale steady-state kinetic analysis, Langmuir, 20, 6374, 10.1021/la0498859 · DOI
  11. Tseng, 2006, Catalytic efficiency of a thrombomodulin-functionalized membrane-mimetic film in a flow model, Biomaterials, 27, 2768, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.032 · DOI
  12. Pallares, 2008, Frequency response of an electrochemical probe to the wall shear stress fluctuations of a turbulent channel flow, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51, 4753, 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.10.043 · DOI
  13. Pallares, 2014, Mass transfer rate of a first-order chemical reaction on a wall at high Schmidt numbers, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 69, 438, 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.10.040 · DOI
  14. Lévêque, 1928, Les Lois de la transmission de Chaleur par convection, Ann. Min., 13, 201
  15. Ekström, 2000, Integrated microanalytical technology enabling rapid and automated protein identification, Anal. Chem., 72, 286, 10.1021/ac990731l · DOI
  16. Young, 1980, Estimation of diffusion coefficients of proteins, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 22, 947, 10.1002/bit.260220504 · DOI
  17. Spence, 1968, Heat transfer to a quadratic shear profile, J. Fluid Mech., 33, 753, 10.1017/S0022112068001667 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Pallares, J., & Ferré, J. A.
Venue
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
80
Pages
192-198
ISSN
0017-9310
Cited by
11
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review