CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antecedents and consequences of travelers’ trust towards personalized travel recommendations offered by ChatGPT

Ali, Faizan, Yasar, Buket, Ali, Laiba, Dogan, Seden·2023·International Journal of Hospitality Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103588
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103588

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Adamopoulou, 2020, An overview of chatbot technology. In Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations: 16th IFIP WG 12.5 International Conference, 373
  2. Ahmad, 2021, How do chatbot features influence consumer trust in e-commerce?, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 62
  3. Ahmed, 2023, The Impact of ChatGPT on the Nursing Profession: Revolutionizing Patient Care and Education, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1
  4. Ali, 2023, Let the devil speak for itself: Should ChatGPT be allowed or banned in hospitality and tourism schools?, Journal of Global Hospitality and Tourism, 2, 1, 10.5038/2771-5957.2.1.1016 · DOI
  5. Alkhodairi, 2021, Investigating the impact of chatbot performance on user trust in a customer service context, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 56
  6. Carvalho, I., & Ivanov, S. (2023). ChatGPT for tourism: applications, benefits and risks. Tourism Review. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. 〈https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-02-2023-0088〉· · DOI
  7. Cheung, 2020, Can chatbots be your financial advisor? An empirical examination, J. Bus. Res., 112, 114
  8. Choi, 2002, Antecedents and consequences of web advertising credibility: a study of consumer response to banner ads, J. Interact. Advert., 3, 12, 10.1080/15252019.2002.10722064 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Colom, 2010, Human intelligence and brain networks, Dialogs Clin. Neurosci., 12, 489, 10.31887/DCNS.2010.12.4/rcolom · DOI
  10. Følstad, 2021, Investigating the user experience of customer service chatbot interaction: a framework for qualitative analysis of chatbot dialogues, Qual. Use Exp., 6, 6, 10.1007/s41233-021-00046-5 · DOI
  11. Gao, H., Tang, J., Hu, X., & Liu, H. (2015, February). Content-aware point of interest recommendation on location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 29, No. 1). · DOI
  12. Gao, 2021, Exploring the antecedents of trust in medical chatbots: the roles of perceived usefulness and perceived empathy, Int. J. Med. Inform., 148
  13. Gavalas, 2014, Mobile recommender systems in tourism, Journal of network and computer applications, 39, 319, 10.1016/j.jnca.2013.04.006 · DOI
  14. Gu, 2009, Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 11605, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.024 · DOI
  15. Gupta, 2016, Toward the development of a big data analytics capability, Information & Management, 53, 1049, 10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hildebrand, 2021, Conversational robo advisors as surrogates of trust: onboarding experience, firm perception, and consumer financial decision making, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 659, 10.1007/s11747-020-00753-z · DOI
  17. Jahn, 2021, Chatbots for customer support: state of the art and future opportunities, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., 63, 93
  18. Johnson, 2008, Understanding how technology paradoxes affect customer satisfaction with self-service technology: the role of performance ambiguity and trust in technology, Psychol. Mark., 25, 416, 10.1002/mar.20218 · DOI
  19. Kabadayi, 2019, Smart service experience in hospitality and tourism services: a conceptualization and future research agenda, J. Serv. Manag., 30, 326, 10.1108/JOSM-11-2018-0377 · DOI
  20. Kasilingam, 2020, Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping, Technol. Soc., 62, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101280 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kim, 2021, When do you trust AI? The effect of number presentation detail on consumer trust and acceptance of AI recommendations, Psychol. Mark., 38, 1140, 10.1002/mar.21498 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kim, 2020, The impact of perceived privacy and trust on online purchasing behavior, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 55
  23. Kim, 2020, Investigating the impact of artificial intelligence-enabled chatbots on customer satisfaction, Inf. Syst. J., 30, 259
  24. Lankton, 2014, Incorporating trust-in-technology into expectation disconfirmation theory, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 128, 10.1016/j.jsis.2013.09.001 · DOI
  25. Law, 2022, Effects of human likeness and conversational breakdown on trust in chatbots for customer service. NordiCHI'22, Nord. Hum. -Comput. Interact. Conf., 56, 1
  26. Lehrig, T., Krancher, O., & Dibbern, J. (2017). How users perceive and actualize affordances: An exploratory case study of collaboration platforms. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017), Seoul, South Korea. Association for Information Systems (AIS).
  27. Li, 2008, Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 17, 39, 10.1016/j.jsis.2008.01.001 · DOI
  28. Loureiro, 2022, Symmetric and asymmetric modeling to understand drivers and consequences of hotel chatbot engagement, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., 1
  29. Mai, 2019, Ethical products= less strong: how explicit and implicit reliance on the lay theory affects consumption behaviors, J. Bus. Ethics, 158, 659, 10.1007/s10551-017-3669-1 · DOI
  30. Majumder, 2021, Are chatbots really useful for human resource management, Int. J. Speech Technol., 24, 969, 10.1007/s10772-021-09834-y · DOI
  31. Paul, 2023, ChatGPT and consumers: benefits, pitfalls and future research agenda, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 10.1111/ijcs.12928 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Pillai, 2020, Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., 32, 3199, 10.1108/IJCHM-04-2020-0259 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Pozzi, G., Pigni, F., & Vitari, C. (2014). Affordance theory in the IS discipline: A review and synthesis of the literature. In AMCIS 2014 Proceedings.
  34. Przegalinska, 2019, In bot, we trust A new technology of chatbot performance measures, Bus. Horiz., 62, 785, 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.005 · DOI
  35. Reiss, 2023, Testing the reliability of ChatGPT for text annotation and classification: a cautionary remark, arXiv Prepr. arXiv, 2304, 11085
  36. Sharma, 2020, An empirical investigation on the impact of personalized content and chatbot expertise on users' trust, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 55
  37. Shi, 2021, Antecedents of trust and adoption intention toward artificially intelligent recommendation systems in travel planning: a heuristic–systematic model, Journal of Travel Research, 60, 1714, 10.1177/0047287520966395 · DOI
  38. Shin, 2021, The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: implications for explainable AI, Int. J. Hum. -Comput. Stud., 146, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Shin, 2022, The actualization of meta affordances: Conceptualizing affordance actualization in the metaverse games, Computers in human behavior, 133, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107292 · DOI
  40. Sousa, 2020, The impact of chatbots on customer trust and intention to use in a hotel booking context, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 91
  41. Sternberg, 2012, Intelligence, Dialog-. Clin. Neurosci., 14, 19, 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/rsternberg · DOI
  42. Tan, 2022, Multi-chatbot or single-chatbot? The effects of M-commerce chatbot interface on source credibility, social presence, trust, and purchase intention, Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., 10.1155/2022/2501538 · DOI
  43. Tseng, 1999, Credibility and computer technology, Commun. ACM, 42, 39, 10.1145/301353.301402 · DOI
  44. Waizenegger, 2020, An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19, European Journal of Information Systems, 29, 429, 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417 · DOI
  45. Wang, 2019, The influence of chatbot intelligence on users' trust and loyalty, J. Bus. Res., 98, 365
  46. Wang, 2022, Artificial intelligence changes the way we work: a close look at innovating with chatbots, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 74, 339, 10.1002/asi.24621 · DOI
  47. Wathen, 2001, Believe it or not: factors influencing credibility on the Web, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 53, 134, 10.1002/asi.10016 · DOI
  48. Wu, 2019, A study of users' trust in chatbots: the effect of perfectionism, interaction involvement, and response quality, J. Bus. Res., 98, 428
  49. Xu, 2019, Trust and perceived risk in mobile payment adoption: a comparative analysis of China and the US, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 45, 181
  50. Yousafzai, 2009, A proposed model of e-trust for electronic banking, Technovation, 29, 260
  51. Zeithaml, 2002, The behavioral consequences of service quality, J. Mark., 60, 31, 10.1177/002224299606000203 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Zhang, 2021, The impact of chatbot intelligence on users’ trust and behavioral intention: a mixed-methods study, Telemat. Inform., 62
  53. Zhou, 2010, Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption, Comput. Hum. Behav., 26, 760, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Ali, F., Yasar, B., Ali, L., & Dogan, S.
ORCID
Ali, Faizan
Venue
International Journal of Hospitality Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
114
Pages
103588
ISSN
0278-4319
DOI
10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103588
Cited by
185
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review