Cited by 69Chemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityHybrid Renewable Energy Systems

Environmental evaluation of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using the Cu–Cl Cycle: A parametric study

Ozbilen, Ahmet, Dincer, Ibrahim, Rosen, Marc A.·2011·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.067

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 21 · Cited by 69

Authors
Ozbilen, A., Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A.
Affiliations
Ontario Tech University (CA)
Corresponding author
Ozbilen, Ahmet
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
36
Issue
16
Pages
9514-9528
ISSN
0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985714544
Cited by
69
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Keywords
thermochemical water splitting, copper-chlorine cycle, nuclear hydrogen production, life cycle assessment, environmental impact, acidification potential, global warming potential, thermal energy requirements, parametric study, system lifetime, production capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review