Cited by 122Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsReliability and Maintenance OptimizationRisk and Safety Analysis

Fault tree analysis for PEM fuel cell degradation process modelling

Placca, Latevi, Kouta, Raed·2011·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.093

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The commonest failure mechanisms of proton exchange membranes can be divided into chemical and mechanical degradation.

    “The commonest failure mechanisms of proton exchange membranes can be divided into two categories: chemical and mechanical degradation [92].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Placca, L., & Kouta, R.
Affiliations
Université de technologie de belfort-montbéliard (FR)
Corresponding author
Placca, Latevi
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
36
Issue
19
Pages
12393-12405
ISSN
0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086157601
Cited by
122
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, fuel cell degradation, fault tree analysis, degradation modeling, membrane degradation, catalyst layer degradation, fuel cell reliability, cycling conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review