Performance analysis and optimization of a hydrogen liquefaction system assisted by geothermal absorption precooling refrigeration cycle
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The optimal exergetic cost of liquid H2 was calculated to be 1.349 $/kgLH2.
“Also, the optimal exergetic cost of liquid H2 was calculated to be 1.349 $/kgLH2.73”
From Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [73]
The SEC, COP, and exergy yield in the optimized H2 liquefaction system were calculated to be 11.52 kWh/kgLH2, 0.346, and 69.44%, respectively.
“The SEC, COP, and exergy yield in the optimized H2 liquefaction system were calculated to be 11.52 kWh/kgLH2, 0.346, and 69.44%, respectively.”
From Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [73]
Cites
Introducing and energy analysis of a novel cryogenic hydrogen liquefaction process configuration
Sadaghiani, M. S., & Mehrpooya, M. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.136 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
A novel hydrogen liquefaction process configuration with combined mixed refrigerant systems
Asadnia, M., & Mehrpooya, M. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.260 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Geothermal energy use in absorption precooling for Claude hydrogen liquefaction cycle
Kanoglu, M., Yilmaz, C., & Abusoglu, A. (2016) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.068 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Yilmaz, C. (2018) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.063 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mehrenjani, J. R., Gharehghani, A., & Sangesaraki, A. G. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115266 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Ghorbani, B., Zendehboudi, S., Saady, N. M. C., Duan, X., & Albayati, T. M. (2023) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c01072 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Ghorbani, B., Zendehboudi, S., & Afrouzi, Z. A. (2023) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116506 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yilmaz, C., & Kaska, O.
- ORCID
- Yilmaz, Ceyhun
- Venue
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 20203-20213
- ISSN
- 0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888877873
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi (KAR?YER.160)
- Firat University Scientific Research Projects Management Unit
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
- Keywords
- hydrogen liquefaction, absorption refrigeration, geothermal water, thermoeconomic optimization, exergetic cost, liquefied hydrogen, genetic algorithm optimization, electricity consumption reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
