Quantitative risk assessment using a Japanese hydrogen refueling station model
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The risk analysis associated with running stations using liquid H2 fuel is restricted.
“As a result, the risk analysis associated with running stations using liquid H2 fuel is restricted.388”
From Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [388]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 98
- Authors
- Suzuki, T., Shiota, K., Izato, Y.-I., Komori, M., Sato, K., Takai, Y., Ninomiya, T., & Miyake, A.
- Affiliations
- Yokohama National University (JP)
- Japan Petroleum Energy Center (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Miyake, Atsumi
- Venue
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 8329-8343
- ISSN
- 0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3118214044
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ynu.repo.nii.ac.jp
- Locations
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (acceptedVersion)
- Yokohama National University Repository (Yokohama National University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Combustion and Detonation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
- Keywords
- hydrogen refueling stations, quantitative risk assessment, jet fire, hydrogen explosion, hydrogen fires, risk prioritization, risk mitigation, fuel cell vehicles, hydrogen safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
