Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geochemical reactions-induced hydrogen loss during underground hydrogen storage in sandstone reservoirs

Bo, Zhenkai, Zeng, Lingping, Chen, Yongqiang, Xie, Quan·2021·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Abstract

Abstract Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) appears to be an important means as a large-scale and long-term energy storage solution. A primary concern of UHS is the in-situ geochemical reactions-induced hydrogen loss. In this context, we performed geochemical modelling to examine the hydrogen loss associated with hydrogen dissolution and fluid-rock interactions using PHREEQC (Version 3) as a function of temperature and pressure. We also performed geochemical modelling with kinetics to investigate the potential hydrogen loss in two commercial gas storage reservoirs (Tubridgi and Mondarra) in Western Australia against the reservoir mineralogy, fluid properties, depth and temperature. Our results show that increasing pressure and temperature only slightly increases hydrogen solubility in brines without minerals. Increasing salinity slightly decreases the solubility of hydrogen in brines. The saturated hydrogen aqueous solution almost does not react with silicate and clay minerals, which is favorable for underground hydrogen storage in quartz-rich sandstone reservoirs. However, unlike silicate and clay minerals, carbonates like calcite triggers up to 9.5% hydrogen loss due to calcite dissolution induced hydrogen dissociation process. Kinetic simulations show that Tubridgi only leads to 0.72% of hydrogen loss, and Mondarra causes 2.76% of hydrogen loss as a result of reservoir calcite dissolution and hydrogen dissociation in brines in 30-year time. Nearly over 87% of calcite cement from Mondarra may be dissolved in 30-year, suggesting potential risks associated with wellbore stability. In conclusion, geochemical reactions-induced hydrogen loss would be minor for UHS in porous media, and we argue that deep calcite-free reservoirs together with calcite-free caprocks would be preferable for underground hydrogen storage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.116

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Bo, Z., Zeng, L., Chen, Y., & Xie, Q.
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
46
Issue
38
Pages
19998-20009
ISSN
0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154481162
Cited by
316
References
61
FWCI
13.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geochemical reactions-induced hydrogen loss during underground hydrogen storage in sandstone reservoirs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.116
The paper
Bo, Z., Zeng, L., Chen, Y., & Xie, Q. (2021). Geochemical reactions-induced hydrogen loss during underground hydrogen storage in sandstone reservoirs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.