Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,214

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects

Tarkowski, Radoslaw·2019·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Abstract In this study underground hydrogen storage in various storage types (aquifers, depleted deposits of natural gas and oil, salt caverns) is examined. A road map for the implementation of underground hydrogen storage is presented. Underground hydrogen storage does not significantly differ from natural gas storage. Nevertheless, it is not yet an available and technically feasible manner of storing energy and it will not prove to be one in the near future. The lower cost of hydrogen production through electrolysis will be the decisive factor for the implementation of this method of energy storage on an industrial scale. Numerous problems and challenges in this field are presented. The fact that specific properties of gaseous hydrogen will have to be handled adequately to provide tightness during underground storage, transport and withdrawal has been noted. The choice of geological structures for underground hydrogen storage should be based on a detailed geological analysis, taking geological and engineering criteria into account. Any possibility of hydrogen escape beyond the limits of an underground storage facility should result in the rejection of the hazardous location. The factors related to the surface installations should be considered only after the selection based on geological criteria has been conducted. Geological, technological, economic, legal and social obstacles have to be overcome before the underground hydrogen storage is implemented on a full scale. As a result of the complexity of the issue coupled with the lack of experience in this kind of operations a prolonged period of studies can be expected. Any future implementations will have to be preceded by extensive studies aimed at a better understanding of the processes of hydrogen interaction with ambient rocks and the installations. Plans to reduce all the hazards involved should be prepared. These activities should proceed in well-defined time frames.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,214

Metadata

Authors
Tarkowski, R.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
105
Pages
86-94
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912263470
Cited by
1,214
References
0
FWCI
24.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051
The paper
Tarkowski, R. (2019). Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.