The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects
Abstract
Abstract In this study underground hydrogen storage in various storage types (aquifers, depleted deposits of natural gas and oil, salt caverns) is examined. A road map for the implementation of underground hydrogen storage is presented. Underground hydrogen storage does not significantly differ from natural gas storage. Nevertheless, it is not yet an available and technically feasible manner of storing energy and it will not prove to be one in the near future. The lower cost of hydrogen production through electrolysis will be the decisive factor for the implementation of this method of energy storage on an industrial scale. Numerous problems and challenges in this field are presented. The fact that specific properties of gaseous hydrogen will have to be handled adequately to provide tightness during underground storage, transport and withdrawal has been noted. The choice of geological structures for underground hydrogen storage should be based on a detailed geological analysis, taking geological and engineering criteria into account. Any possibility of hydrogen escape beyond the limits of an underground storage facility should result in the rejection of the hazardous location. The factors related to the surface installations should be considered only after the selection based on geological criteria has been conducted. Geological, technological, economic, legal and social obstacles have to be overcome before the underground hydrogen storage is implemented on a full scale. As a result of the complexity of the issue coupled with the lack of experience in this kind of operations a prolonged period of studies can be expected. Any future implementations will have to be preceded by extensive studies aimed at a better understanding of the processes of hydrogen interaction with ambient rocks and the installations. Plans to reduce all the hazards involved should be prepared. These activities should proceed in well-defined time frames.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Underground hydrogen storage: a comprehensive review
Zivar, D., Kumar, S., & Foroozesh, J. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.138 · Cited by 1,287
Technical potential of salt caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe
Caglayan, D. G., Weber, N., Heinrichs, H. U., Linßen, J., Robinius, M., Kukla, P. A., & Stolten, D. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.161 · Cited by 733
Zhang, L., Jia, C., Bai, F., Wang, W., An, S., Zhao, K., Li, Z., Li, J., & Sun, H. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129455 · Cited by 659
The future of hydrogen energy: Bio-hydrogen production technology
Xu, X., Zhou, Q., & Yu, D. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.261 · Cited by 526
Large-vscale hydrogen production and storage technologies: Current status and future directions
Olabi, A. G., bahri, A. S., Abdelghafar, A. A., Baroutaji, A., Sayed, E. T., Alami, A. H., Rezk, H., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.110 · Cited by 492
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarkowski, R.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 86-94
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912263470
- Cited by
- 1,214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051
- The paper
- Tarkowski, R. (2019). Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.