Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 538

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review on hydrogen safety issues: Incident statistics, hydrogen diffusion, and detonation process

Yang, Fuyuan, Wang, Tianze, Deng, Xintao, Dang, Jian, Huang, Zhaoyuan, Hu, Song, Li, Yangyang, Ouyang, Minggao·2021·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.005

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. Astbury, 2007, Spontaneous ignition of hydrogen leaks: a review of postulated mechanisms, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 32, 2178, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.005 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.005
  2. Wen, 2003, The safety of hydrogen energy and fuel cell vehicles, Acta Energiae Solaris Sin, 24, 677
  3. Vudumu, 2010, Experimental and computational investigations of hydrogen safety, dispersion and combustion for transportation applications, SIAM J Sci Comput, 32, 947
  4. Jinyang, 2016, Research status in-situ of hydrogen safety, J Saf Environ, 16, 144
  5. Adamson, 2000, Hydrogen and methanol: a comparison of safety, economics, efficiencies and emissions, J Power Sources, 86, 548, 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00404-8 · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(99)00404-8
  6. Schefer, 2008, Investigation of small-scale unintended releases of hydrogen: momentum-dominated regime, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 33, 6373, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.041 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.041
  7. Ewan, 1986, Structure and velocity-measurements in underexpanded jets, Combust Sci Technol, 45, 275, 10.1080/00102208608923857 · doi:10.1080/00102208608923857
  8. 2019, Nel investigation into explosion at Kjørbo hydrogen station, Fuel Cell Bull, 7
  9. Tong, 2020, One-dimensional model of hydrogen distribution in confined space based on Froude number, Ann Nucl Energy, 138, 1, 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107210 · doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107210
  10. Veser, 2011, The structure and flame propagation regimes in turbulent hydrogen jets, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2351, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.123 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.123
  11. Kotchourko, 2014, Concentration measurements in a round hydrogen jet using Background Oriented Schlieren (BOS) technique, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 39, 6201, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.152 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.152
  12. Swain, 2007, An experimental investigation into the ignition of leaking hydrogen, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 32, 287, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.06.041 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.06.041
  13. Houf, 2008, Analytical and experimental investigation of small-scale unintended releases of hydrogen, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 33, 1435, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.11.031 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.11.031
  14. Veser, 2011, The structure and flame propagation regimes in turbulent hydrogen jets, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2351, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.123 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.123
  15. Han, 2014, Experimental investigation of highly pressurized hydrogen release through a small hole, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 39, 9552, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.044 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.044
  16. Jirka, 2004, Integral model for turbulent buoyant jets in unbounded stratified flows. Part I: single round jet, Environ Fluid Mech, 4, 1, 10.1023/A:1025583110842 · doi:10.1023/a:1025583110842
  17. Jirka, 2006, Integral model for turbulent buoyant jets in unbounded stratified flows. Part 2: plane jet dynamics resulting from multiport diffuser jets, Environ Fluid Mech, 6, 43, 10.1007/s10652-005-4656-0 · doi:10.1007/s10652-005-4656-0
  18. Winters, 2009, Modeling leaks from liquid hydrogen storage systems, Sandia National Laboratories
  19. Xiao, 2009, Non-boussinesq integral model for horizontal turbulent buoyant round jets, Sci Technol Nuclear Installations, 2009, 10.1155/2009/862934 · doi:10.1155/2009/862934
  20. El-Amin, 2012, Horizontal H 2-air turbulent buoyant jet resulting from hydrogen leakage, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 37, 3949, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.007 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.007
  21. Christopher, 2013, Integral model and CFD simulations for hydrogen leaks, CIE J, 64, 3088
  22. Kim, 2009, Behavior of buoyancy and momentum controlled hydrogen jets and flames emitted into the quiescent atmosphere, J Loss Prevent Proc, 22, 943, 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.08.018 · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2009.08.018
  23. Cumber, 1995, Predictions of the structure of turbulent, highly underexpanded jets, J Fluid Eng-T Asme, 117, 599, 10.1115/1.2817309 · doi:10.1115/1.2817309
  24. 2010, Effect of nozzle diameter on the supersonic jet structure, Theor Appl Mech Jpn, 58, 213
  25. Ruffin, 1996, Large scale characterization of the concentration field of supercritical jets of hydrogen and methane, J Loss Prevent Proc, 9, 279, 10.1016/0950-4230(96)00018-6 · doi:10.1016/0950-4230(96)00018-6
  26. Addy, 1981, Effects of axisymmetric sonic nozzle geometry on Mach disk characteristics, AIAA J, 19, 121, 10.2514/3.7751 · doi:10.2514/3.7751
  27. Stewart, 2020, CFD modelling of underexpanded hydrogen jets exiting rectangular shaped openings, Process Saf Environ, 139, 283, 10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.043 · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.043
  28. Ruggles, 2012, Ignitability and mixing of underexpanded hydrogen jets, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 37, 17549, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.063 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.063
  29. Birch, 1987, Velocity decay of high pressure jets, Combust Sci Technol, 52, 161, 10.1080/00102208708952575 · doi:10.1080/00102208708952575
  30. Davidor, 2015, Shock standoff distances and Mach-disk diameters in underexpanded sonic jets, AIAA J, 9, 1651, 10.2514/3.6410 · doi:10.2514/3.6410
  31. Addy, 1981, Effects of axisymmetric sonic nozzle geometry on Mach disk characteristics, AIAA J, 19, 121, 10.2514/3.7751 · doi:10.2514/3.7751
  32. Crist, 1966, Study of the highly underexpanded sonic jet, AIAA J, 4, 68, 10.2514/3.3386 · doi:10.2514/3.3386
  33. Velikorodny, 2012, Numerical study of the near-field of highly underexpanded turbulent gas jets, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 37, 17390, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.142 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.142
  34. Manins, 1979, Turbulent buoyant convection from a source in a confined region, J Fluid Mechanics Digital Archive, 91, 765, 10.1017/S0022112079000434 · doi:10.1017/s0022112079000434
  35. Kumamoto, 2011, Measurement of minimum ignition energy in hydrogen-oxygen-nitrogen premixed gas by spark discharge, J Physics Conference, 301
  36. Ekoto, 2011, Performance-based testing for hydrogen leakage into passenger vehicle compartments, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 10169, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.007 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.007
  37. Yu, 2019, Numerical study of hydrogen dispersion in a fuel cell vehicle under the effect of ambient wind, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 44, 22671, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.234 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.234
  38. Zhao, 2021, Leak localization using distributed sensors and machine learning for hydrogen releases from a fuel cell vehicle in a parking garage, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, 1420, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.218 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.218
  39. Choi, 2013, A CFD simulation of hydrogen dispersion for the hydrogen leakage from a fuel cell vehicle in an underground parking garage, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 38, 8084, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.018 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.018
  40. Gu, 2020, Hazard analysis on tunnel hydrogen jet fire based on CFD simulation of temperature field and concentration field, Saf Sci, 122, 104532, 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104532 · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104532
  41. Zhang, 2020, Numerical simulation on methane-hydrogen explosion in gas compartment in utility tunnel, Process Saf Environ, 140, 100, 10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.025 · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.025
  42. Huang, 2012, Influences of H2O mass fraction and chemical kinetics mechanism on the turbulent diffusion combustion of H2–O2 in supersonic flows, Acta Astronaut, 76, 51, 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.017 · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.017
  43. Ivanov, 2013, Hydrogen–oxygen flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transition in three-dimensional rectangular channels with no-slip walls, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 38, 16427, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.124 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.124
  44. Vincent-Randonnier, 2019, An experimental and computational study of hydrogen–air combustion in the LAPCAT II supersonic combustor, Proc Combust Inst, 37, 3703, 10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.127 · doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.127
  45. Burke, 2012, Comprehensive H2/O2 kinetic model for high-pressure combustion, Int J Chem Kinet, 44, 444, 10.1002/kin.20603 · doi:10.1002/kin.20603
  46. Liu, 2019, Investigation of influence of detailed chemical kinetics mechanisms for hydrogen on supersonic combustion using large eddy simulation, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 44, 5007, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.005 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.005
  47. Kim, 2004, Numerical calculation of minimum ignition energy for hydrogen and methane fuels, KSME Int J, 18, 838, 10.1007/BF02990303 · doi:10.1007/bf02990303
  48. Kumamoto, 2011, Measurement of minimum ignition energy in hydrogen-oxygen-nitrogen premixed gas by spark discharge, J Physics Conference, 301
  49. Ma, 2012, Theoretical model of minimum ignition energy prediction for methane-air mixture, Chin J High Press Phys, 26, 301
  50. Xu, 2009, The effect of pressure boundary rupture rate on spontaneous ignition of pressurized hydrogen release, J Loss Prevent Proc, 22, 279, 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.07.007 · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2008.07.007
  51. Mari, 2007, A procedure for the calculation of the natural gas molar heat capacity, the isentropic exponent, and the Joule–Thomson coefficient, Flow Meas Instrum, 18, 18, 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2006.12.001 · doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2006.12.001
  52. Randelman, 1988, Joule-Thomson coefficients of hydrogen and methane mixtures, J Chem Eng Data, 33, 293, 10.1021/je00053a021 · doi:10.1021/je00053a021
  53. Ernst, 2001, Flow-calorimetric results for the massic heat capacitycpand the Joule–Thomson coefficient of CH4, of (0.85CH4 + 0.15C2H6), and of a mixture similar to natural gas, J Chem Thermodyn, 33, 601, 10.1006/jcht.2000.0740 · doi:10.1006/jcht.2000.0740
  54. Zhu, 2019, Study on flow characteristics of high pressure and low temperature hydrogen, China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technol
  55. Merilo, 2012, Self-ignition of hydrogen releases through electrostatic discharge induced by entrained particulates, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 37, 17561, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.167 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.167
  56. Glor, 2003, Ignition hazard due to static electricity in particulate processes, Powder Technol, 135, 223, 10.1016/j.powtec.2003.08.017 · doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2003.08.017
  57. Imamura, 2009, Control of the ignition possibility of hydrogen by electrostatic discharge at a ventilation duct outlet, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 34, 2815, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.028 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.028
  58. Yamada, 2011, Mechanism of high-pressure hydrogen auto-ignition when spouting into air, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2560, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.011 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.011
  59. Mogi, 2009, Self-ignition and flame propagation of high-pressure hydrogen jet during sudden discharge from a pipe, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 34, 5810, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.04.079 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.04.079
  60. Mogi, 2008, Self-ignition and explosion during discharge of high-pressure hydrogen, J Loss Prevent Proc, 21, 199, 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.008 · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.008
  61. Li, 2019, Effects of obstacles inside the tube on the shock wave propagation and spontaneous ignition of high-pressure hydrogen, Fuel, 236, 1586, 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.120 · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.120
  62. Li, 2019, Experimental study of spontaneous ignition induced by sudden hydrogen release through tubes with different shaped cross-sections, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 44, 23821, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.083 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.083
  63. Gong, 2016, Experimental study on flow characteristics and spontaneous ignition produced by pressurized hydrogen release through an Omega-shaped tube into atmosphere, Fuel, 184, 770, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.078 · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.078
  64. Duan, 2016, Experimental investigation of spontaneous ignition and flame propagation at pressurized hydrogen release through tubes with varying cross-section, J Hazard Mater, 320, 18, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.005 · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.005
  65. Mogi, 2008, Self-ignition and explosion during discharge of high-pressure hydrogen, J Loss Prevent Proc, 21, 199, 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.008 · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.008
  66. Golub, 2008, Mechanisms of high-pressure hydrogen gas self-ignition in tubes, J Loss Prevent Proc, 21, 185, 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.012 · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.012
  67. Lee, 2011, Experimental investigation on the self-ignition of pressurized hydrogen released by the failure of a rupture disk through tubes, Proc Combust Inst, 33, 2351, 10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.040 · doi:10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.040
  68. Kim, 2013, A flow visualization study on self-ignition of high pressure hydrogen gas released into a tube, Proc Combust Inst, 34, 2057, 10.1016/j.proci.2012.07.020 · doi:10.1016/j.proci.2012.07.020
  69. Kitabayashi, 2013, Experimental study on high pressure hydrogen jets coming out of tubes of 0.1–4.2 m in length, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 38, 8100, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.040 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.040
  70. Grune, 2014, Experimental investigation of flame and pressure dynamics after spontaneous ignition in tube geometry, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 39, 20396, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.046 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.046
  71. Duan, 2016, Experimental study on spontaneous ignition and flame propagation of high-pressure hydrogen release via a tube into air, Fuel, 181, 811, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.066 · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.066
  72. Gong, 2016, Experimental study of pressure dynamics, spontaneous ignition and flame propagation during hydrogen release from high-pressure storage tank through 15 mm diameter tube and exhaust chamber connected to atmosphere, Fuel, 182, 419, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.127 · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.127
  73. Jiang, 2019, Pressure dynamics, self-ignition, and flame propagation of hydrogen jet discharged under high pressure, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 44, 22661, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.268 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.268
  74. Wang, 2019, Experimental study on spontaneous ignition and flame propagation of high-pressure hydrogen release through tubes, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 44, 22584, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.188 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.188
  75. Cho, 1986, Catalytic ignition of fuel/oxygen/nitrogen mixtures over platinum, Combust Flame, 66, 159, 10.1016/0010-2180(86)90088-X · doi:10.1016/0010-2180(86)90088-x
  76. Enomoto, 1998, Catalytic ignition of hydrogen-oxygen on platinum, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 27, 2259, 10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80075-1 · doi:10.1016/s0082-0784(98)80075-1
  77. Rubtsov, 2019, Ignition of hydrogen-methane-air mixtures over Pd foil at atmospheric pressure, Mendeleev Commun, 29, 469, 10.1016/j.mencom.2019.07.039 · doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2019.07.039
  78. Mingyue, 2007, Interaction of implosion flame and induced shock wave and DDT, J Propuls Technol, 28, 248
  79. Ng, 2008, Comments on explosion problems for hydrogen safety, J Loss Prevent Proc, 21, 136, 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.001 · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.001
  80. Gui, 2020, Turbulent combustion related with detonation, Acta Aerodyn Sin, 38, 515
  81. Xiao, 2012, Experimental and numerical investigation of premixed flame propagation with distorted tulip shape in a closed duct, Combust Flame, 159, 1523, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.12.003 · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.12.003
  82. Urtiew, 1966, Experimental observations of transition to detonation in an explosive gas, vol. 295, 13
  83. Liberman, 2009, Formation of the preheated zone ahead of a propagating flame and the mechanism underlying the deflagration-to-detonation transition, Phys Lett, 373, 501, 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.12.008 · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2008.12.008
  84. Kuznetsov, 2010, Experimental study of the preheat zone formation and deflagration to detonation transition, Combust Sci Technol, 182, 1628, 10.1080/00102202.2010.497327 · doi:10.1080/00102202.2010.497327
  85. Liberman, 2010, Deflagration-to-detonation transition in highly reactive combustible mixtures, Acta Astronaut, 67, 688, 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.05.024 · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.05.024
  86. Ciccarelli, 2008, Flame acceleration and transition to detonation in ducts, Prog Energ Combust, 34, 499, 10.1016/j.pecs.2007.11.002 · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2007.11.002
  87. Lee, 1978, Photochemical initiation of gaseous detonations, Acta Astronaut, 5, 971, 10.1016/0094-5765(78)90003-6 · doi:10.1016/0094-5765(78)90003-6
  88. Zeldovich, 1980, Regime classification of an exothermic reaction with nonuniform initial conditions, Combust Flame, 39, 211, 10.1016/0010-2180(80)90017-6 · doi:10.1016/0010-2180(80)90017-6
  89. Gamezo, 2008, Flame acceleration and DDT in channels with obstacles: effect of obstacle spacing, Combust Flame, 155, 302, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.06.004 · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.06.004
  90. Ivanov, 2013, Hydrogen-oxygen flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transition in three-dimensional rectangular channels with no-slip walls, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 38, 16427, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.124 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.124
  91. Ivanov, 2011, Hydrogen-oxygen flame acceleration and transition to detonation in channels with no-slip walls for a detailed chemical reaction model, Phys Rev E - Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys, 83, 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.056313 · doi:10.1103/physreve.83.056313
  92. Ivanov, 2011, Flame acceleration and DDT of hydrogen–oxygen gaseous mixtures in channels with no-slip walls, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 7714, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.134 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.134
  93. Liberman, 2011, On detonation initiation by a temperature gradient for a detailed chemical reaction models, Phys Lett, 375, 1803, 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.03.026 · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2011.03.026
  94. Han, 2017, Flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transition in micro and macro-channels: an integrated mechanistic study, Combust Flame, 176, 285, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.10.010 · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.10.010
  95. Goodwin, 2018, Premixed flame stability and transition to detonation in a supersonic combustor, Combust Flame, 197, 145, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.07.008 · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.07.008
  96. Hu, 2010, Rapid detonation initiation by sparks in a short duct: a numerical study, Shock Waves, 20, 241, 10.1007/s00193-010-0252-4 · doi:10.1007/s00193-010-0252-4
  97. Dounia, 2019, Influence of kinetics on DDT simulations, Combust Flame, 200, 1, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.11.009 · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.11.009
  98. Gamezo, 2008, Flame acceleration and DDT in channels with obstacles: effect of obstacle spacing, Combust Flame, 155, 302, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.06.004 · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.06.004
  99. Goodwin, 2016, Effect of decreasing blockage ratio on DDT in small channels with obstacles, Combust Flame, 173, 16, 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.07.029 · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.07.029
  100. Emami, 2015, LES of flame acceleration and DDT in hydrogen–air mixture using artificially thickened flame approach and detailed chemical kinetics, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 40, 7395, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.165 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.165

Cited by

See all 538

Metadata

Authors
Yang, F., Wang, T., Deng, X., Dang, J., Huang, Z., Hu, S., Li, Y., & Ouyang, M.
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
46
Issue
61
Pages
31467-31488
ISSN
0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.005
OpenAlex
W3194513863
Cited by
538
References
16
FWCI
34.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2019YFB1504902, 2020YFF0305700)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review on hydrogen safety issues: Incident statistics, hydrogen diffusion, and detonation process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.005
The paper
Yang, F., Wang, T., Deng, X., Dang, J., Huang, Z., Hu, S., Li, Y., & Ouyang, M. (2021). Review on hydrogen safety issues: Incident statistics, hydrogen diffusion, and detonation process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.