Cited by 91Risk and Safety AnalysisSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

Data requirements for improving the Quantitative Risk Assessment of liquid hydrogen storage systems

Open access
Correa-Jullian, Camila, Groth, Katrina M.·2022·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.266

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The three main factors for the development of the main standards of H2 fueling stations based on risk assessment techniques include (i) the various contexts and infrastructures involved, (ii) the probability of leakage, failure, and combustion, and (iii) the physical behavior of H2 in release, combustion, and accumulation.

    “The three main factors for the development of the main standards of H2 fueling stations based on risk assessment techniques include (i) the various contexts and infrastructures involved, (ii) the probability of leakage, failure, and combustion, and (iii) the physical behavior of H2 in release, combustion, and accumulation.387”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [50]LaChance J, Tchouvelev A, Engebo A. Development of uniform harmcriteriaforuseinquantitativeriskanalysisofthehydrogen infrastructure. Int J Hydrogen Energy Feb. 2011;36(3):2381 e 8. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0360-3199(2104376-7/sref50)
  2. [53]Abdalla AM, Hossain S, Nisfindy OB, Azad AT, Dawood M, Azad AK. Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0360-3199(2104376-7/sref53) key challenges with applications: a review. Energy Convers Manag Jun. 2018;165(January):602 e 27. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0360-3199(2104376-7/sref53)
  3. [54]Peters M, Menon N, Ruple M, Martin J, Winkler E. H2First: dispenser reliability. 2019 DOE annual merit review, vol. 1; 2019. p. 1 e 29. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0360-3199(2104376-7/sref54)
  4. [55]Hartmann K, Correa-Jullian C, Buttner W, Groth KM, Thorson J. Hydrogen component leak rate quantification for system risk and reliability assessment through QRA and PHM frameworks. In: Accepted in 9th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (September 2021). International Association for Hydrogen Safety; 2021. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0360-3199(2104376-7/sref55)
  5. [58]McDougall M, Stephens D. Cumulative fuel system life cycle and durability testing of hydrogen containers (report No. DOT HS 811 832). 2013. Washington, DC. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0360-3199(2104376-7/sref58)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Correa-Jullian, C., & Groth, K. M.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Correa-Jullian, Camila
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
4222-4235
ISSN
0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217223174
Cited by
91
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 10
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (DE-AC36-08GO28308)
  • Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (CHILE/2019\u201373200077)
  • Agenția Națională pentru Cercetare și Dezvoltare
  • U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Keywords
liquid hydrogen storage, quantitative risk assessment, hydrogen refueling stations, failure mode and effects analysis, event sequence diagrams, fault tree analysis, hydrogen safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review