Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Performance of pneumonia severity index and CURB-65 in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19

Open access
Satici, Celal, Demirkol, Mustafa Asim, Sargin Altunok, Elif, Gursoy, Bengul, Alkan, Mustafa, Kamat, Sadettin, Demirok, Berna, Surmeli, Cemile Dilsah, Calik, Mustafa, Cavus, Zuhal, Esatoglu, Sinem Nihal·2020·International Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the usefulness of CURB-65 and the pneumonia severity index (PSI) in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19, and to identify other factors associated with higher mortality. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in a pandemic hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, which included 681 laboratory-confirmed patients with COVID-19. Data on characteristics, vital signs, and laboratory parameters were recorded from electronic medical records. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to quantify the discriminatory abilities of the prognostic scales. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify other predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Higher CRP levels were associated with an increased risk for mortality (OR: 1.015, 95% CI: 1.008-1.021; p < 0.001). The PSI performed significantly better than CURB-65 (AUC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.93 vs AUC: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85-0.90; p = 0.01), and the addition of CRP levels to PSI did not improve the performance of PSI in predicting mortality (AUC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.93 vs AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94; p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: In a large group of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, we found that PSI performed better than CURB-65 in predicting mortality. Adding CRP levels to PSI did not improve the 30-day mortality prediction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.038

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Satici, C., Demirkol, M. A., Sargin Altunok, E., Gursoy, B., Alkan, M., Kamat, S., Demirok, B., Surmeli, C. D., Calik, M., Cavus, Z., & Esatoglu, S. N.
Venue
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
98
Pages
84-89
ISSN
1201-9712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035399681
Cited by
186
References
4
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of pneumonia severity index and CURB-65 in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.038
The paper
Satici, C., Demirkol, M. A., Sargin Altunok, E., Gursoy, B., Alkan, M., Kamat, S., Demirok, B., Surmeli, C. D., Calik, M., Cavus, Z., & Esatoglu, S. N. (2020). Performance of pneumonia severity index and CURB-65 in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.038

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.