The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social media mining for product planning: A product opportunity mining approach based on topic modeling and sentiment analysis
Abstract
Abstract Social media data have recently attracted considerable attention as an emerging voice of the customer as it has rapidly become a channel for exchanging and storing customer-generated, large-scale, and unregulated voices about products. Although product planning studies using social media data have used systematic methods for product planning, their methods have limitations, such as the difficulty of identifying latent product features due to the use of only term-level analysis and insufficient consideration of opportunity potential analysis of the identified features. Therefore, an opportunity mining approach is proposed in this study to identify product opportunities based on topic modeling and sentiment analysis of social media data. For a multifunctional product, this approach can identify latent product topics discussed by product customers in social media using topic modeling, thereby quantifying the importance of each product topic. Next, the satisfaction level of each product topic is evaluated using sentiment analysis. Finally, the opportunity value and improvement direction of each product topic from a customer-centered view are identified by an opportunity algorithm based on product topics’ importance and satisfaction. We expect that our approach for product planning will contribute to the systematic identification of product opportunities from large-scale customer-generated social media data and will be used as a real-time monitoring tool for changing customer needs analysis in rapidly evolving product environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media
Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005 · Cited by 4,970
Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00049 · Cited by 3,301
Latent dirichlet allocation for tag recommendation
Krestel, R., Fankhauser, P., & Nejdl, W. (2009) · Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems · doi:10.1145/1639714.1639726 · Cited by 494
Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being?
Brooks, S. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.053 · Cited by 434
Cited by
Joung, J., & Kim, H. M. (2021) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4048960 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeong, B., Yoon, J., & Lee, J.-M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 280-290
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2761561877
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social media mining for product planning: A product opportunity mining approach based on topic modeling and sentiment analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.09.009
- The paper
- Jeong, B., Yoon, J., & Lee, J.-M. (2019). Social media mining for product planning: A product opportunity mining approach based on topic modeling and sentiment analysis. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.09.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.