The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 142 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How pre-adoption expectancies shape post-adoption continuance intentions: An extended expectation-confirmation model
Abstract
Abstract Extant research examines the factors that cause the initial adoption of digital technologies, like mobile wallets, with limited focus on post-adoption behaviours. This work proposes a novel extended expectation–confirmation model which explores the impact of pre-adoption expectancies and confirmation on post-adoption satisfaction and continuance intentions. The model also explores the roles played by the post-adoption factors like perceived user interface quality, perceived security and self-efficacy. The findings indicate that pre-adoption performance/effort expectancies impact consumption-driven confirmation, which in turn affects the post-adoption perceived usefulness, post-adoption perceived security, and user satisfaction. Further, satisfaction, post-adoption self-efficacy and post-adoption perceived usefulness are found to be strong antecedents of the user’s continuance intention. The framework contributes to the extant research by integrating both pre- and post-adoption constructs that determine post-adoption continuance intentions. The framework also guides the M-wallet application developers to enhance user satisfaction and continuance intentions by meeting their pre-adoption expectations through consumption-driven confirmation, in order to stay relevant in an extremely competitive m-payments business.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc-rcessc.v1i1.25 · Cited by 38,891
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
Leguina, A. (2015) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2015.1005806 · Cited by 18,921
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Cited by
Nguyen, D. M., Chiu, Y.-T. H., & Le, H. D. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13147625 · Cited by 269
Sahi, A. M., Khalid, H., Abbas, A. F., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2021) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc7040230 · Cited by 124
Ahmed, S., & Aziz, N. A. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2400395 · Cited by 67
Why Users Continue E-Commerce Chatbots? Insights from PLS-FsQCA-NCA Approach
Foroughi, B., Huy, T. Q., Iranmanesh, M., Ghobakhloo, M., Rejeb, A., & Nikbin, D. (2025) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2024.2371910 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, A., Yousaf, A., & Mishra, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 102094
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3006671097
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 142
- FWCI
- 34.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How pre-adoption expectancies shape post-adoption continuance intentions: An extended expectation-confirmation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102094
- The paper
- Gupta, A., Yousaf, A., & Mishra, A. (2020). How pre-adoption expectancies shape post-adoption continuance intentions: An extended expectation-confirmation model. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.