Cited by 306Cultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsTechnology's Impact on Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impending disruption of creative industries by generative AI: Opportunities, challenges, and research agenda

Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, Abdalla, Samar, Mogaji, Emmanuel, Elbanna, Amany, Dwivedi, Yogesh K.·2024·International Journal of Information Management

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102759

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Anguiano, 2023, How Hollywood writers triumphed over and why it matters, The Guardian
  2. Bugaj, 2023, Generative artificial intelligence-based diagnostic algorithms in disease risk detection, personalised and targeted healthcare procedures, and patient care safety and quality, Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice, 15, 1
  3. Eller, 2023, Technology as a New Evolution in Fighting Disease, In the Lab eNewsletter, 18, 5
  4. Haque, M.U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z.T., Rajapakse, R.N., & Ahmad, H. (2022). " I think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data—arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.05856. · arXiv
  5. Karjala, 2016, Oracles v. Google and the Scope of a Computer Program Copyright, Journal of Intellectual Property, 24, 1
  6. Kocielnik, 2019, Will you accept an imperfect AI? Exploring designs for adjusting end-user expectations of AI systems, In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1
  7. Santos, 2018, Industry 4.0: an overview, Vol. 2, 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 306

Metadata

Authors
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Abdalla, S., Mogaji, E., Elbanna, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K.
Affiliations
  • Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
  • Keele University (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • Symbiosis International University (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Abdalla, Samar
  • Mogaji, Emmanuel
  • Elbanna, Amany
  • Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
79
Pages
102759
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391644905
Cited by
305
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 143 · 2024: 44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Technology's Impact on Media
Keywords
generative AI, creative industries, artificial intelligence adoption, human creativity, human-AI collaboration, authenticity, workflow automation, creative process, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review