Cited by 282Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyDigital Transformation in IndustryInnovation and Knowledge Management

Artificial intelligence implementation in manufacturing SMEs: A resource orchestration approach

Open access
Peretz-Andersson, Einav, Tabares, Sabrina, Mikalef, Patrick, Parida, Vinit·2024·International Journal of Information Management

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing a leading role in the digital transformation of enterprises, particularly in the manufacturing industry where it has been responsible for a profound transformation in key business and production operations. Despite the accelerated growth of AI technologies, knowledge of the implementation of AI by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) remains underexplored. Thus, this study seeks to examine how manufacturing SMEs orchestrate resources for AI implementation. Building on the resource orchestration (RO) theory and recent work on AI implementation, we investigate multiple case studies involving manufacturing SMEs in Sweden operating in the packaging, plastic, and metal sectors. Our findings indicate that SMEs structure a portfolio based on acquiring and accumulating AI resources. AI resources are bundled into learning and governance capabilities to leverage configurations for AI implementation. Through a dynamic process of AI resource orchestration, SMEs effectively leverage AI resources and capabilities by mobilising technologies, coordinating manufacturing processes, and empowering skilled people. This research contributes to existing practice and the academic literature on AI implementation, highlighting how SMEs orchestrate AI resources and capabilities to drive an organisation’s digital transformation whilst creating a competitive advantage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102781

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Process innovation has a significant impact on the sustainability of SMEs.

    “process innovation was also found to have a significant impact on the sustainability of SMEs”

    From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Peretz-Andersson et al., 2024

    The discussion passage says AI implementation can make manufacturing SMEs more sustainable, and the passage on sustainable solutions describes reduced material use. The paper does not establish that process innovation generally has a significant impact on SME sustainability; its finding concerns AI implementation in the manufacturing SMEs studied, without a reported significance test. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AI application drives company productivity and performance and forms business models and core processes that increase competitiveness in SMEs.

    “Based on research (Peretz-Andersson et al., 2024) which examines Innovationinnovation for SMEs sustainability, especially through the application of AI that drives company productivity and performance and forms business models and core processes that increase competitiveness.”

    From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Peretz-Andersson et al., 2024

    Section 5 describes AI improving manufacturing SMEs’ internal processes, efficiency, performance, and competitive advantage. However, the paper does not establish that AI reshapes their business models; on p. 13, it explicitly leaves open whether the AI-supported practices improve productivity. Those parts of the citing sentence overstate the findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Technologies such as 3D printing, automation, and AI can be used to increase production speed and precision, thereby reducing waste and improving product consistency.

    “Technologies such as 3D printing, automation, and artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to increase production speed and precision, thereby reducing waste and improving product consistency (Peretz-Andersson et al., 2024).”

    From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Peretz-Andersson et al., 2024

    The discussion of production processes (p. 13) says AI can reduce time wasted in production and that sensors and production data can reduce scrap from faulty manufacturing. A manager also describes greater precision between robotic and machine interfaces. But the paper mentions 3D printing and automation as technologies that may complement AI in future research (p. 20); it does not establish that they deliver the claimed speed, precision, waste reduction, or product consistency. Improved product quality is reported, but product consistency is not specifically addressed. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The application of AI drives enterprise productivity and performance and shapes core business models and processes that enhance competitiveness.

    “The application of AI drives enterprise productivity and performance and shapes core business models and processes that enhance competitiveness.”

    From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Peretz-Andersson et al., 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peretz-Andersson, E., Tabares, S., Mikalef, P., & Parida, V.
Affiliations
  • Jönköping University (SE)
  • Luleå University of Technology (SE)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Peretz-Andersson, Einav
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
77
Pages
102781
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393910198
Cited by
218
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 27
FWCI
66.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Osuva (University of Vaasa) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Epubl LTU (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Knowledge Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
AI implementation, small and medium-sized enterprises, manufacturing SMEs, resource orchestration theory, learning ability, governance capacity, digital transformation, competitive advantage, packaging industry, plastics industry, metal industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review