The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Additional cross-cultural validity testing of the Intercultural Development Inventory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In a study with 71 recruiters in a U.S. high-tech organization (Hammer, 2011), scores on the IDI were found to be correlated ( r = .43) with the rating of success in meeting diversity goals for recruitment.”
From Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016) · cites this paper as Hammer, 2011
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 287
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Bennett, 2009, Defining, measuring, and facilitating intercultural learning: A conceptual introduction the Intercultural Education double supplement, Intercultural Education, 20, 1, 10.1080/14675980903370763 · DOI
- Bhawuk, 1992, The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 413, 10.1016/0147-1767(92)90031-O · DOI
- Brislin, 1976, Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies, International Journal of Psychology, II, 215, 10.1080/00207597608247359 · DOI · Paper page
- Brislin, 1980, Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials, Vol. 2, 389
- Browne, 1989, Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445, 10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4 · DOI
- Darden, 1983, Review of behavioral modeling in marketing
- Fry, 1977, Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17, Journal of Reading, 21, 242
- Gibson, 1970, The first course in speech: A survey of U.S. colleges and universities, Speech Teacher, 19, 13, 10.1080/03634527009377786 · DOI
- Goldbort, 2001, Readable writing by scientists and researchers, Journal of Environmental health, 63, 40
- Hammer, 1999, A measure of intercultural sensitivity: The Intercultural Development Inventory, Vol. 2
- Hammer, 2003, Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The Intercultural Development Inventory, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421, 10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Marsh, 1988, Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of simple size, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391, 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · DOI
- Paige, R. M, Jacobs-Cassuto, M., Yershova, Y. A., & DeJaeghere, J. (2003). Assessing intercultural sensitivity: An empirical analysis of the Hammer and Bennett Intercultural Development Inventory. In R. M. Paige (Ed.) (Special issue: Intercultural development). International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 467–486.
- Schneider, 2009, Readability and basic course hybrid textbooks in human communication: A disparity of reading difficulty, Communication Research Reports, 26, 361, 10.1080/08824090903293676 · DOI
- Sellnow, 2005, Texbook technology supplements: What are they good for?, Communication Education, 54, 243, 10.1080/03634520500356360 · DOI
- Torres, 2005, The Cloze Test Procedure as a test of plagiarism: The influence of text readability, The Journal of Psychology, 139, 221, 10.3200/JRLP.139.3.221-232 · DOI
- White, 2000, Grading the readability of articles, Canadian Journal of Public Health, 9, 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammer, M. R.
- Affiliations
- American University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hammer, Mitchell R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Intercultural Relations
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 474-487
- ISSN
- 0147-1767 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000467846
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 42.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Intercultural Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
- Keywords
- Intercultural Development Inventory, intercultural competence, intercultural sensitivity, cross-cultural validity, Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity, cultural orientation, developmental continuum, criterion validity, diversity and inclusion, readability, ethnocentrism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review