Cited by 15Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

Damage degree prediction method of CFRP structure based on fiber Bragg grating and epsilon-support vector regression

Lu, Shizeng, Jiang, Mingshun, Wang, Xiaohong, Yu, Hongliang, Su, Chenhui·2019·Optik

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.11.086

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, S., Jiang, M., Wang, X., Yu, H., & Su, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Jinan (CN)
  • Shandong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Shizeng
Venue
Optik
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
180
Pages
244-253
ISSN
0030-4026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901317013
Cited by
15
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Optik (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61803179, 41472260)
  • Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2017BF007)
  • Young Scholars Program of Shandong University, China (2016WLJH30)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Keywords
carbon fiber reinforced polymer, fiber Bragg grating sensors, epsilon-support vector regression, structural health monitoring, Fourier transform features, dimensionality reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review