The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures
Open accessAbstract
3D printing is a popular technique for fabricating three-dimensional solid objects from a digital design. In order to produce high quality 3D printed parts, the appropriate selection of printing parameters is crucial. This research is focused on studying the properties of 3D printed specimens (i.e., mechanical, thermal and morphological) with varying processing conditions such as infill pattern, infill density and infill speed, and also with different printing materials. A number of testing techniques such as tensile, bending, compression, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), thermal imaging, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used for performing a comprehensive analysis. The results showed that Young's modulus of the printed parts increased with the increase of infill density. For pure PLA, parts with 100% infill density obtained the highest Young's modulus of 1538.05 MPa. Of the tested infill speeds from 70 to 110 mm/s; 90 mm/s infill speed gave the highest Young's modulus for pure PLA. Meanwhile, there was a slight difference of Young's modulus between low speeds (70 mm/s and 80 mm/s) and high speeds (100 mm/s and 110 mm/s) compared to the commonly used infill speed of 90 mm/s. The level of crystallinity of the 3D printed PLA specimens did not directly influence the mechanical properties as was confirmed by the DSC results. SEM images showed that the strength of the printed samples was dependent upon the arrangement of their layers. Furthermore, it was found that the most appropriate processing temperature and infill speed for pure PLA filament are 215 °C and 90 mm/s, respectively. Among the five printing materials tested, carbon fibre reinforced PLA (CFR-PLA) gave the highest Young's modulus of 2637.29 MPa at 90 mm/s. Voids inside the matrix and the gaps between layers lead to initiation of cracks of the specimens. Overall, 100% infill density, 90 mm/s infill speed, 215 °C of set nozzle temperature, and the linear fill pattern were the possible optimal process settings for the most improved performance of the five different printing materials used in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farah, S., Anderson, D. G., & Langer, R. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 · Cited by 3,443
3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective
Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., & Hui, D. (2017) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 · Cited by 3,325
Gibson, I., Rosen, D., & Stucker, B. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 · Cited by 3,299
Ning, F., Cong, W., Qiu, J., Wei, J., & Wang, S. (2015) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 · Cited by 1,718
Natural fibres as reinforcement in polylactic acid (PLA) composites
Oksman, K., Skrifvars, M., & Selin, J.-F. (2003) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00103-9 · Cited by 1,565
Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts
Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2010) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 · Cited by 1,318
Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites
Tian, X., Liu, T., Yang, C., Wang, Q., & Li, D. (2016) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 · Cited by 1,162
Introduction to Composite Materials Design
Barbero, E. J. (2010) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781439894132 · Cited by 1,092
Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.
Ventola, C. L. (2014) · PubMed Central · Cited by 920
Tensile properties of short-glass-fiber- and short-carbon-fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites
Fu, S.-Y., Lauke, B., Mäder, E., Yue, C.-Y., & Hu, X. (2000) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00068-3 · Cited by 908
Cited by
Valvez, S., Silva, A. P., & Reis, P. N. B. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14132564 · Cited by 195
Mathiazhagan, N., Palaniyappan, S., & Sivakumar, N. K. (2023) · Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105611 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Abeykoon, C., Sri-Amphorn, P., & Fernando, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 284-297
- ISSN
- 2588-8404 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3010601952
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 19.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003
- The paper
- Abeykoon, C., Sri-Amphorn, P., & Fernando, A. (2020). Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.