Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures

Open access
Abeykoon, Chamil, Sri-Amphorn, Pimpisut, Fernando, Anura·2020·International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture

Abstract

3D printing is a popular technique for fabricating three-dimensional solid objects from a digital design. In order to produce high quality 3D printed parts, the appropriate selection of printing parameters is crucial. This research is focused on studying the properties of 3D printed specimens (i.e., mechanical, thermal and morphological) with varying processing conditions such as infill pattern, infill density and infill speed, and also with different printing materials. A number of testing techniques such as tensile, bending, compression, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), thermal imaging, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used for performing a comprehensive analysis. The results showed that Young's modulus of the printed parts increased with the increase of infill density. For pure PLA, parts with 100% infill density obtained the highest Young's modulus of 1538.05 MPa. Of the tested infill speeds from 70 to 110 mm/s; 90 mm/s infill speed gave the highest Young's modulus for pure PLA. Meanwhile, there was a slight difference of Young's modulus between low speeds (70 mm/s and 80 mm/s) and high speeds (100 mm/s and 110 mm/s) compared to the commonly used infill speed of 90 mm/s. The level of crystallinity of the 3D printed PLA specimens did not directly influence the mechanical properties as was confirmed by the DSC results. SEM images showed that the strength of the printed samples was dependent upon the arrangement of their layers. Furthermore, it was found that the most appropriate processing temperature and infill speed for pure PLA filament are 215 °C and 90 mm/s, respectively. Among the five printing materials tested, carbon fibre reinforced PLA (CFR-PLA) gave the highest Young's modulus of 2637.29 MPa at 90 mm/s. Voids inside the matrix and the gaps between layers lead to initiation of cracks of the specimens. Overall, 100% infill density, 90 mm/s infill speed, 215 °C of set nozzle temperature, and the linear fill pattern were the possible optimal process settings for the most improved performance of the five different printing materials used in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Abeykoon, C., Sri-Amphorn, P., & Fernando, A.
Venue
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
284-297
ISSN
2588-8404 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010601952
Cited by
417
References
22
FWCI
19.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003
The paper
Abeykoon, C., Sri-Amphorn, P., & Fernando, A. (2020). Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.