Cited by 58Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Perceived coercion and need for hospitalization related to psychiatric admission

Bonsack, Charles, Borgeat, François·2005·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

Psychiatric hospitalization constitutes a moment of major stress to the point that occurrences of posttraumatic stress disorders have been described. Feelings of coercion are usual, whatever the legal status of admission. Patients may also consider afterwards that they needed hospitalization even if they refused it initially. A cross-sectional survey has been conducted among the inpatients of a Swiss psychiatric hospital to assess their subjective view of admission with emphasis on legal status, perceived coercion and need for hospitalization. Eighty-seven questionnaires were completed and analyzed. Results indicated that 74% of patients felt that they had been under pressure to be hospitalized, whether or not they were involuntarily admitted. Seventy percent felt their admission was necessary. More involuntary patients reported a subjective lack of improvement. Clinicians could decrease feelings of coercion of their patients while discussing need for hospitalization, legal status and subjective feeling of coercion as different dimensions. An argument is presented to favor positive pressure from social environment over legal involuntary commitment in many hospitalizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.03.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Involuntary admission may be associated with difficulties establishing clinical rapport and patient insight into illness.

    “However, involuntary admission may be associated with difficulties establishing clinical rapport and patient insight into illness (12,49,50).”
  • Among voluntarily admitted people, the proportion who did not correctly state their legal status ranged from 1% to 12%.

    “Among voluntarily admitted people, the proportion who did not correctly state their legal status ranged from 1% to 12% (12,15).”
  • All studies that examined patient knowledge of legal status found significant confusion among both people treated on an involuntary and voluntary basis regarding their legal rights or status.

    “All studies that examined patient knowledge of legal status found significant confusion among both people treated on an involuntary and voluntary basis regarding their legal rights or status (10–15).”
  • The proportion of people in involuntary care who did not know their legal status ranged from 12% to 45%, with a median of 28.5%.

    “The proportion of people in involuntary care who did not know their legal status ranged from 12% (12) to 45% (11,15), with a median of 28.5%.”
  • Perceptions of coercion were not necessarily related to objective legal status.

    “As a result, perceptions of coercion were not necessarily related to objective legal status (12,33), with high degrees of perceived coercion found among those receiving voluntary care (11,13–15,27,29).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 58

Authors
Bonsack, C., & Borgeat, F.
Affiliations
Hôpital de Cery (CH)
Corresponding author
Borgeat, François
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
342-347
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085277062
Cited by
58
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
perceived coercion, psychiatric hospitalization, involuntary admission, post-traumatic stress disorder, subjective improvement, patient experience
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Patient Admission, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review