CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 146Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEating Disorders and BehaviorsElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attitudes of patients with anorexia nervosa to compulsory treatment and coercion

Open access
Tan, Jacinta O.A., Stewart, Anne, Fitzpatrick, Raymond, Hope, Tony·2010·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
DOI 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.10.003PMC PMC2808473
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The compulsory treatment of anorexia nervosa is a contentious issue. Research suggests that patients are often subject to compulsion and coercion even without formal compulsory treatment orders. Research also suggests that patients suffering from anorexia nervosa can change their minds in retrospect about compulsion. METHODS: Qualitative interviewing methods were used to explore the views of 29 young women concerning compulsion and coercion in the treatment of anorexia nervosa. The participants were aged between 15 to 26years old, and were suffering or had recently suffered from anorexia nervosa at the time of interview. RESULTS: Compulsion and formal compulsory treatment of anorexia nervosa were considered appropriate where the condition was life-threatening. The perception of coercion was moderated by relationships. What mattered most to participants was not whether they had experienced restriction of freedom or choice, but the nature of their relationships with parents and mental health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: People with anorexia nervosa appear to agree with the necessity of compulsory treatment in order to save life. The perception of coercion is complex and not necessarily related to the degree of restriction of freedom.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.10.003

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Buchanan, 1989, Chapter 1: Competence and incompetence, 17
  2. 2007, Chapter 3: How should people be helped to make their own decisions?, 29
  3. Grisso, 1998, Chapter 3: Abilities related to competence, 31

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 146

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tan, J. O. A., Stewart, A., Fitzpatrick, R., & Hope, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Tan, Jacinta O.A.
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
13-19
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.10.003
PMC
PMC2808473
OpenAlex
W2135096682
Cited by
146
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, involuntary treatment, patient attitudes, young women, parent-adolescent relationships, professional-patient relationship, restriction of liberty, mental health law
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Attitude, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Patients, Psychotherapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review