Cited by 150Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEating Disorders and BehaviorsEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Competence to refuse treatment in anorexia nervosa

Tan, Jacinta, Hope, Tony, Stewart, Anne·2003·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2003.09.010

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, J., Hope, T., & Stewart, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Tan, Jacinta
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
697-707
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998668927
Cited by
150
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (063792)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, decision-making capacity, informed consent, treatment refusal, clinical judgment, inter-rater reliability, severe anorexia nervosa
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Attitude to Death, Decision Making, England, Female, Forensic Psychiatry, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Treatment Refusal, Mental Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review