The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model
Abstract
Objective This paper presents a revised technology acceptance model to examine what determines mobile healthcare systems (MHS) acceptance by healthcare professionals.Method Conformation factor analysis was performed to test the reliability and validity of the measurement model. The structural equation modeling technique was used to evaluate the causal model.Results The results indicated that compatibility, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use significantly affected healthcare professional behavioral intent. MHS self-efficacy had strong indirect impact on healthcare professional behavioral intent through the mediators of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Yet, the hypotheses for technical support and training effects on the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use were not supported.Conclusion This paper provides initial insights into factors that are likely to be significant antecedents of planning and implementing mobile healthcare to enhance professionals' MHS acceptance. The proposed model variables explained 70% of the variance in behavioral intention to use MHS; further study is needed to explore extra significant antecedents of new IT/IS acceptance for mobile healthcare. Such as privacy and security issue, system and information quality, limitations of mobile devices; the above may be other interesting factors for implementing mobile healthcare and could be conducted by qualitative research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There was variation in the health IT that served as the focus of the study, including telemedicine technology [32], picture archiving and communications systems [108, 109], and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) [101] (see Table 2 for full list).”
From The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2010) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“Five studies collected data from a mix of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and medical technicians [106-110].”
From The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2010) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“Several studies were set in Taiwan [103, 109, 110], Hong Kong [32, 48, 49], the UK [96, 104], Australia [102, 111], and the mainland US [98, 99, 106, 107] and Hawaii [97]. Others were set in Belgium [108], Finland [100], and Quebec [101].”
From The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2010) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“Perhaps so, but in some studies, the effect of PEOU is as strong as that of PU [103], if not much stronger [109].”
From The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2010) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“For example, the common addition of variables related to compatibility between the health IT and clinical work processes in the reviewed studies [48, 49, 98, 103, 105, 106, 109] is in line with growing interest in the concept of “fit” as a critical need for successful IT design [131, 132], especially in health care [21, 28, 57, 62, 72, 100, 133-135].”
From The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2010) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, the two studies with relatively strong PEOU effects both had young, mostly non-physician samples in Taiwanese medical centers who had hands-on experience with the IT [103, 109].”
From The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2010) · cites this paper as [109]
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,801
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bandura, 1982, Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency, Am. Psychol., 37, 122, 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 607
Cai, Q., Ye, L., Horne, R., Bi, J., Xu, Q., Ye, X., Yang, A., Jin, M., Li, X., & Lv, Q. (2019) · Journal of Asthma · doi:10.1080/02770903.2019.1565824 · Cited by 28
Hankins, J. S., Shah, N., DiMartino, L., Brambilla, D. J., Fernández, M. E., Gibson, R. W., Gordeuk, V. R., Lottenberg, R., Kutlar, A., Melvin, C. L., et al. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/16319 · Cited by 27
Rho, M. J., Kim, S. R., Kim, H., Cho, J., Yoon, K., Mun, S. K., & Choi, I. Y. (2014) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0309 · Cited by 27
Longacre, M. R., Grande, S. W., Hager, A., Montan, M. V., Bergquist, R. P., Mårtensson, M. B., & Kotzbauer, G. (2018) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/11080 · Cited by 27
Noh, M., Jang, H., Choi, B., & Khongorzul, G. (2017) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666917729730 · Cited by 26
Evaluating User Needs in Wellness Apps
Platt, A. J., Outlay, C. N., Sarkar, P., & Karnes, S. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1099803 · Cited by 26
Lin, S.-M. (2016) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1232751 · Cited by 26
Theocharidis, A.-I. T., Argyropoulou, M., Karavasilis, G. I., Vrana, V. G., & Kehris, E. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12218973 · Cited by 24
The effect of self-efficacy and outcome expectation on medication adherence behaviour
Okuboyejo, S. R., Mbarika, V. W. A., & Omoregbe, N. A. (2018) · Journal of Public Health in Africa · doi:10.4081/jphia.2018.826 · Cited by 25
Jeong, J., Kim, Y., & Roh, T. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211040070 · Cited by 25
Interpretive Flexibility in Mobile Health: Lessons From a Government-Sponsored Home Care Program
Nielsen, J. A., & Mathiassen, L. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2816 · Cited by 30
Evacuation support system for improved medical documentation and information flow in the field
Walderhaug, S., Meland, P. H., Marius Mikalsen, A., SAGEN, T., & Brevik, J. I. (2007) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.01.006 · Cited by 25
An alternative sensor Cloud architecture for vital signs monitoring
Ghanavati, S., Abawajy, J., & Izadi, D. (2016) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2016.7727556 · Cited by 24
User Behavioral Intention Toward Using Mobile Healthcare System
Keikhosrokiani, P., Mustaffa, N., Zakaria, N., & Baharudin, A. S. (2018) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-6198-9.ch022 · Cited by 24
Can electric buses entice more public transport use? Empirical evidence from Vietnam
Nguyen, M. H., & Pojani, D. (2023) · Case Studies on Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101040 · Cited by 28
Citation-based analysis of literature: a case study of technology acceptance research
Hsiao, C., Tang, K., & Liu, J. S. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1749-5 · Cited by 24
Vishwanath, A., Brodsky, L. S., & Shaha, S. H. (2009) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730802592270 · Cited by 24
Kwon, M.-W., Mun, K., Lee, J. K., McLeod, D. M., & D’Angelo, J. D. (2016) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856516641065 · Cited by 24
Technology use within meetings: a generational perspective
Sox, C. B., Campbell, J. M., Kline, S. F., Strick, S. K., & Crews, T. B. (2016) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/jhtt-09-2015-0035 · Cited by 24
Xing, C., & Zhang, X. (2016) · International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications · doi:10.1155/2016/3618402 · Cited by 24
m-Health adoption and sustainability prognosis from a care givers' and patients' perspective
Hwabamungu, B., & Williams, Q. (2010) · South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists · doi:10.1145/1899503.1899517 · Cited by 25
Health information technology usability evaluation: methods, models, and measures
Yen, P. (n.d.) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 24
Tsai, S., Sun, Y.-C., & Taur, F. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.07.002 · Cited by 23
Lau, M. M., Lam, A. Y. C., Cheung, R., & Leung, T. F. (2019) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1145/3306500.3306549 · Cited by 23
Udo, G., Bagchi, K., & Maity, M. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2543-2 · Cited by 23
Shajari, M., & Ismail, Z. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Management Science · doi:10.1109/icams.2010.5552982 · Cited by 22
Jen, W.-Y. (2010) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2009.0126 · Cited by 22
Beyond technology acceptance to effective technology use: a parsimonious and actionable model
Holahan, P. J., Lesselroth, B., Adams, K. A., Wang, K., & Church, V. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocu043 · Cited by 22
Liao, G., Chien, Y.-T., Chen, Y.-J., Hsiung, H.-F., Chen, H.-J., Hsieh, M., & Wu, W.-J. (2017) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.6233 · Cited by 22
Iskandar, Y. H. P., Subramaniam, G., Majid, M. I. A., Ariff, A. M., & Rao, G. K. L. (2020) · Health Information Science and Systems · doi:10.1007/s13755-019-0094-0 · Cited by 23
Hogaboam, L., Ragel, B. T., & Daim, T. U. (2014) · Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) · Cited by 22
Raitoharju, R. (2014) · UTUPub (University of Turku) · Cited by 22
Demsash, A. W., Kalayou, M. H., & Walle, A. D. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05680-z · Cited by 21
“In Sweden, a variety of wireless technologies such as mobile computing, wireless networks, and global positioning systems have been applied to ambulance care [27], and these are also functional for emergency patient care in the Netherlands [28].”
BackgroundWolkow, T. D., Durrenberger, L. T., Maynard, M. A., Harrall, K. K., & Hines, L. M. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-03-0056 · Cited by 21
Analysing the diffusion and adoption of mobile IT across social worlds
Nielsen, J. A., & Mengiste, S. A. (2014) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458213481688 · Cited by 21
Haverila, M. J., McLaughlin, C., & Haverila, K. C. (2022) · International Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.1080/20479700.2022.2082635 · Cited by 23
Monfort, G. M., Paluzié, G., Díaz-Gegúndez, M., & Chabrera, C. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29640-7 · Cited by 20
Influencing Factors for the Adoption of Smartphone Healthcare Application
Wang, B.-R., Park, J.-Y., & Choi, I.-Y. (2011) · The Journal of the Korea Contents Association · doi:10.5392/jkca.2011.11.10.396 · Cited by 20
Exploring Mobile End User Development: Existing Use and Design Factors
Namoun, A., Daskalopoulou, A., Mehandjiev, N., & Xun, Z. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2016.2532873 · Cited by 20
Mukred, A., Singh, D., & Safie, N. (2017) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2017.10002805 · Cited by 19
Jaradat, M.-I. R. M., Imlawi, J. M., & Mashaqba, A. M. A. (2018) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v12i2.8081 · Cited by 20
Identifying critical success factors for wearable medical devices: a comprehensive exploration
Değerli, M., & Özkan, S. (2020) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-020-00763-2 · Cited by 21
Trinkoff, A. M., Storr, C. L., Wilson, M. L., Gürses, A. P., & Gartrell, K. (2015) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2014-11-ra-0107 · Cited by 20
EHR: a Sensing Technology Readiness Model for Lifestyle Changes
Chen, Y., Le, D., Yumak, Z., & Pu, P. (2017) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-017-0871-4 · Cited by 20
E-Government Field Force Automation: Promises, Challenges, and Stakeholders
Scholl, H. J. (., Fidel, R., Liua, S., Paulsmeyer, M., & Unsworth, K. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74444-3_12 · Cited by 20
Design Processes for User Engagement with Mobile Health: A Systematic Review
Ikwunne, T. A., Hederman, L., & Wall, P. J. (2022) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0130235 · Cited by 20
Son, H., Lee, S., Hwang, N., & Kim, C. (2014) · International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC) · doi:10.22260/isarc2014/0026 · Cited by 19
Burns, A. J., Young, J., Roberts, T., Courtney, J. F., & Ellis, T. S. (2015) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00070 · Cited by 20
Using Information Technology to Improve Quality in the OR
Rothman, B. S., Sandberg, W. S., & Jacques, P. S. (2011) · Anesthesiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2010.11.006 · Cited by 19
Adeyeye, G. B. (2019) · Annals of Spiru Haret University Economic Series · doi:10.26458/1913 · Cited by 19
Deng, Q., Zeng, Z., Zheng, Y., Lu, J., & Liu, W. (2021) · Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control · doi:10.1186/s13756-021-00966-z · Cited by 18
Lin, S.-S., Hung, M., Tsai, C.-L., & Chou, L.-P. (2012) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-012-9836-0 · Cited by 18
Petrovčič, A., Peek, S. T. M., & Dolničar, V. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16091623 · Cited by 18
How mobile health affects primary healthcare? Questionnaire design and attitude assessment
Erfannia, L., Barman, M. P., Hussain, S., Barati, R., & Arji, G. (2020) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/2055207620942357 · Cited by 18
Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of mobile voting
Jaradat, M.-I. R. M. (2013) · International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation · doi:10.1504/ijmlo.2013.051572 · Cited by 18
Mobile Health Technology Evaluation
Idrish, S., Rifat, A., Iqbal, M., & Nisha, N. (2017) · International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijthi.2017040101 · Cited by 19
Wang, S. H. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8114 · Cited by 18
Self-citationNigatu, A. M., Yilma, T. M., Gezie, L. D., Gebrewold, Y., Gullslett, M. K., Mengiste, S. A., & Tilahun, B. C. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301021 · Cited by 17
Clinical information system post-adoption evaluation at the georges pompidou university hospital.
Palm, J.-M., Dart, T., Dupuis, I., Leneveut, L., & Patrice Degoulet, A. (2010) · PubMed Central · Cited by 17
Choices and challenges in e-government field force automation projects
Scholl, H. J. (., Liu, S., Fidel, R., & Unsworth, K. (2007) · International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/1328057.1328142 · Cited by 17
Hsiao, S.-J., & Tseng, H. (2020) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare8010028 · Cited by 17
Nguyen, A., Bui, K., Nguyen, T. Q., & Tran, G. N. (2026) · Green Technologies and Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.grets.2026.100384 · Cited by 14
Mooney, K. M., McElnay, J. C., & Donnelly, R. F. (2015) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-015-0223-5 · Cited by 16
Chiou, W.-C., Perng, C., & Lin, C.-C. (2009) · WASE International Conference on Information Engineering · doi:10.1109/icie.2009.207 · Cited by 16
Improving mobile health apps usage: a quantitative study on mPower data of Parkinson's disease
Li, J., & Chang, X. (2020) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-07-2019-0366 · Cited by 17
An Analysis of Key Factors to Mobile Health Adoption using Fuzzy AHP
Lotfi, F. H., Fatehi, K., & Badie, N. (2020) · International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science · doi:10.5815/ijitcs.2020.02.01 · Cited by 16
Chaudhuri, A., Prætorius, T., Narayanamurthy, G., Hasle, P., & Pereira, V. E. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121184 · Cited by 16
Patterns and changes in prescriber attitudes toward PDA prescription-assistive technology
Vishwanath, A., Brodsky, L., Shaha, S., Leonard, M., & Cimino, M. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.004 · Cited by 16
Mobile Work Support for Field Service: A Literature Review and Directions for Future Research
Herterich, M. M., Peters, C., Neff, A. A., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2015) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · Cited by 16
Run-hua, X., Cvijikj, I. P., Kowatsch, T., Michahelles, F., Büchter, D., Brogle, B., Dintheer, A., I'Allemand, D., & Maaß, W. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14112-1_9 · Cited by 15
Odeibat, A. S. (2023) · Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research · doi:10.54609/reaser.v26i2.420 · Cited by 15
Eivazzadeh, S., Berglund, J. S., Larsson, T. C., Fiedler, M., & Anderberg, P. (2018) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/11252 · Cited by 15
Appiah, B., Burdine, J. N., Aftab, A., Asamoah‐Akuoko, L., Anum, D. A., Kretchy, I. A., Samman, E., Appiah, P. B., & Bates, I. (2018) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.9752 · Cited by 15
Saqib, G., Hassan, M. U., Zubair, M. U., & Choudhry, R. M. (2023) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-12583 · Cited by 14
The effect of age on technology acceptance among field police officers.
Kurkinen, E. (2013) · ISCRAM · Cited by 14
Hsieh, P.-J. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2059007 · Cited by 20
Youm, S., & Park, S.-H. (2015) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2014.0092 · Cited by 14
Wang, Z., Li, B., & Yang, J. (2015) · Advances in Meteorology · doi:10.1155/2015/563673 · Cited by 14
Public Claims about Automatic External Defibrillators: An Online Consumer Opinions Study
Money, A., Barnett, J. C., & Kuljis, J. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-332 · Cited by 14
DECENT: A sociotechnical approach for developing mobile health apps in underserved settings
Ikwunne, T. A., Hederman, L., & Wall, P. J. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231203595 · Cited by 14
Lin, S.-C., Chuang, M.-C., Huang, C.-Y., & Liu, C.-E. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231208483 · Cited by 13
The Effect of Flow Experience and Social Norms on the Adoption of Mobile Games in China
Gao, S. H., Krogstie, J., & Zang, Z. (2016) · International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijmhci.2016010104 · Cited by 13
Nour, B., & Soltani, M. (2019) · Serbian Journal of Management · doi:10.5937/sjm14-13429 · Cited by 13
Usability of a Disease Management Mobile Application as Perceived by Patients With Diabetes
Janatkhah, R., Tabari-Khomeiran, R., Louyeh, A. A., & Kazemnejad, E. (2019) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000532 · Cited by 13
San, A. N. C., & Yee, C. J. (2013) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · Cited by 13
Exploring adoption of smart glasses: Applications in medical industry
Göken, M., Başoğlu, N., & Dabić, M. (2016) · Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) · doi:10.1109/picmet.2016.7806835 · Cited by 13
Mobile IT in health – the case of short messaging service in an HIV awareness program
Bandyopadhyay, T., Meso, P. N., & Negash, S. (2017) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2017.1363029 · Cited by 13
What factors affect physicians’ decisions to use an e-health care system?
Yan, H.-Y., & Wang, M.-J. (2012) · Health · doi:10.4236/health.2012.411156 · Cited by 13
Internet and Health Communication
Heaton, L. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444314861.ch10 · Cited by 13
Sintonen, S. (2008) · LUTPub (LUT University) · Cited by 13
Chen, B., Yan, C., Wang, B., Zou, J., & Tu, S. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26206 · Cited by 12
COVID Alert: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Exposure Notification Apps Among Canadian Residents
Oyibo, K., & Morita, P. P. (2022) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.842661 · Cited by 12
Shortcomings and Challenges of Information System Adoption
Vigoda, M. M., Rothman, B. S., & Green, J. A. (2011) · Anesthesiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2011.05.010 · Cited by 12
The path to mobile shopping compatibility
Jiménez, N., Gutiérrez, S. S. M., & Domínguez, N. P. (2018) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2018.12.006 · Cited by 12
Salimian, S., & Mousavi, S. M. (2022) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-022-03863-4 · Cited by 12
Evaluation of stock trading performance of students using a web-based virtual stock trading system
Wu, H.-C., Tseng, C.-M., Chan, P., Huang, S.-F., Chu, W.-W., & Chen, Y.-F. (2012) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.097 · Cited by 12
Ajili, A. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · doi:10.9734/ajea/2012/1267 · Cited by 12
Design of a Mobile, Safety-Critical in-Patient Glucose Management System
Bernhard, H., Spat, S., Plank, J., Schaupp, L. A., Neubauer, K., Beck, P., Chiarugi, F., Kontogiannis, V., Pieber, T. R., & Holzinger, A. (2011) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-806-9-950 · Cited by 12
Gow, C. X., Wong, S. C., & Lim, C. S. (2019) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation · doi:10.1177/2319510x19872597 · Cited by 12
Embedding Human Values into Information System Engineering Methodologies
Choenni, S., van Waart, P., & Haan, G. (2011) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.13140/2.1.3151.5525 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-C., & Lin, L.-M.
- Affiliations
- National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
- Meiho University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Jen-Her
- ORCID
- Wang, Shu-Ching
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-77
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041318031
- Cited by
- 603
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 35.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education
- National Science Council (NSC 93-2416-H-110-015)
- National Sun Yat-sen University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, healthcare workers, behavioral intention, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, compatibility, self-efficacy, technical support, training
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Diffusion of Innovation, Taiwan, Models, Organizational, Telemedicine, Point-of-Care Systems, Health Care Sector, Computers, Handheld
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
