Cited by 88Electronic Health Records SystemsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

The impact of patient–physician web messaging on healthcare service provision

McGeady, David, Kujala, Jaakko, Ilvonen, Karita·2008·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Background Information technology can support the delivery of healthcare. Patients are eager to make use of such tools as web messaging, yet its deployment has been limited to date. A fear still pervades that the cost associated with a possible increase to physician workloads may outweigh any suggested benefits.Goal This paper aims to review the body of research completed in the area of patient-physician web messaging. The findings of this review will then be assessed and synthesised, with the intention of creating an overview of both the benefits and costs of patient-physician online messaging. Areas of particular importance to future research may then be identified.Results Demand and support for online communication tools amongst patients is strong, and can increase quality of care due to increased patient-physician communication. Although there would seem to be great potential to increase process efficiency, there would not seem to be sufficient evidence as of yet to suggest that this is the case.Conclusion Further quantitative research in particular is required to assess the impact of online communication, with special regard to the effect on overall patient demand and on healthcare process efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.11.004

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGeady, D., Kujala, J., & Ilvonen, K.
Corresponding author
McGeady, David
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
17-23
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143991005
Cited by
88
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
patient-physician communication, online communication tools, health care delivery, physician workload, quality of care, patient demand, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Finland, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Internet, Electronic Mail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review